Results 1 to 11 of 11

FAST 102/102 set-up on stock 346 cubes ?

This is a discussion on FAST 102/102 set-up on stock 346 cubes ? within the External Engine forums, part of the LSx Technical Help Section category; Has anyone with a stock bottom end LS1 with heads and cam bought and install a FAST 102/102 set-up yet ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member LS1Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Richmond,VA
    Age
    47
    Posts
    39

    DK. Blue Metallic
    2002 SS Camaro

    FAST 102/102 set-up on stock 346 cubes ?

    Has anyone with a stock bottom end LS1 with heads and cam bought and install a FAST 102/102 set-up yet ? If so, I have a few questions :

    1) Does your car feels like it has lost any bottom end power ?
    2) Did you have your 102 Intake ported or not ?
    3) What size injectors are you using ?
    4) If you had dyno your car , how much power did your combo pick up over
    your old set-up ?

    I'm asking cause I'm in the market for an Intake and I'm not to keen on buying used parts. I know there are no 92/92 stuff out there anywhere. I currently have a LS6 Intake on my car from the factory . I guess what I'm really trying to say or ask is...........

    5) Do you guys think the 102/102 set-up is overkill for a mild h/c set-up like mine ?

    Thanks in advance

    224cam, LMS Stg II LS6 Heads, 3200 Vig, 323 gear, SLP LT's & lid.

    previous best 11.85/113mph 1.66 60ft" Full Weight/ skinnies up front/ ET Street 275/50/15 summit stars
    Last edited by LS1Mac; 05-12-2010 at 05:12 PM.

  2. #2
    Slow'er'Ass Mr. Luos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    23,785

    Red Tint Jewelcoat
    2008 Trailblazer SS

    I know a member that recently installed his.

    PM him if you would like, or I am sure he will catch this eventually.
    "Dewman"

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Madrid, Iowa
    Age
    43
    Posts
    304

    red
    02 trans am ws6

    I heard that there is no hp gain from the 102 combo on a stock motor. I did find the fast 92 combo at the WS6STORE.com. I have mods and the 92 combo is working great for me on my modded ls6. Give them a call (ws6 store) and see if they have any left. I geuss the 102 took over and the 92 isn't in production anymore. I love my 92mm and I could feel the difference between that and the ls6 intake. The 102 is to much for a stock motor. my .02 worth good luck!

  4. #4
    Senior Member Z28boy2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Rochester, NY Rochesterracing.com
    Posts
    1,276
    2000 Camaro B4C

    Quote Originally Posted by badazta View Post
    I heard that there is no hp gain from the 102 combo on a stock motor. I did find the fast 92 combo at the WS6STORE.com. I have mods and the 92 combo is working great for me on my modded ls6. Give them a call (ws6 store) and see if they have any left. I geuss the 102 took over and the 92 isn't in production anymore. I love my 92mm and I could feel the difference between that and the ls6 intake. The 102 is to much for a stock motor. my .02 worth good luck!
    theres definitely a gain for a stock motor when running a 102...is it over kill for a stock motor, yeah

  5. #5
    Member Dewman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    184

    Navy Blue Metallic
    2000 Camaro z28

    if for some ungodly reason you think the 102 is overkill then you can always run a 92mm TB.

    I have the 102mm installed on my car but i cannot say much about it since the car is not back up and running yet
    Last edited by Dewman; 05-13-2010 at 11:34 AM.

  6. #6
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    29
    Posts
    11,775

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by Dewman View Post
    if for some ungodly reason you think the 102 is overkill then you can always run a 92mm TB.
    exactly!!! it is always about the runners ..the runner design is whats important about intakes and the 102's are redesigned and a better intake than the 92.....now that doesnt mean going from a 92 to a 102 is going to net you huge gains...i think they say stock for stock it is a increase in 5-10 rwhp on average

  7. #7
    Junior Member LS1Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Richmond,VA
    Age
    47
    Posts
    39

    DK. Blue Metallic
    2002 SS Camaro

    Quote Originally Posted by Z28boy2000 View Post
    theres definitely a gain for a stock motor when running a 102...is it over kill for a stock motor, yeah
    I posted this on LS1Tech as well. I'm getting alot of feed back and thats a good thing. Some are saying the 102 intake will be better with a 92 mm tb. I guess we could run a 90,92, or a 102 and be just fine.

    From what I'm gathering is , if you have a 92/92 set-up on a stock bottom end motor ,then you wouldn't see much increase in hp or performance by going to a 102/102 set-up.

    Now if you have a stock intake and installed a 102/102 set-up ,it would benefit any stock bottom end and h/c set-up . I may even go with a 92/102 set.

    The real winners of a 102/102 install are guys with 383's and up . Those motors will love it .

    To sum it all up ,it seems the 102 is here to stay and we are going to take it and we are going to like it .

  8. #8
    Member 408WS6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Age
    50
    Posts
    401

    Current best: 10.60/126.8
    1998 Pontiac TA WS6

    102 mm is way overkill for the stock motor, and last time I checked, gains where only about 5 hp over the 92/92 on bigger cube motors. As a matter of fact you'll probably lose some torque putting that monster of an intake on a stock ls1. Just my opinion..
    Last edited by 408WS6; 05-13-2010 at 05:17 PM.

  9. #9
    formally 01 T/A 0verkill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego ca
    Posts
    2,253

    "Arrest Me Red"
    2001 trans am

    if it was me i would just keep the ls6 you have now and put the cash into some thing like shock and springs or other stuff.

  10. #10
    Member 408WS6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Age
    50
    Posts
    401

    Current best: 10.60/126.8
    1998 Pontiac TA WS6

    what he said makes perfect sense^

    get some suspension mods

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    1,621

    silver
    2000 formula

    its on my Xmas wish list

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. whats better FAST TB or port the stock TB?
    By bpopham22 in forum External Engine
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 08:33 PM
  2. Question: how fast can a stock ls1 tranny go
    By NavdeepWS6 in forum Manual Transmission
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12-09-2008, 07:07 AM
  3. Porting fast with stock ls1?
    By LS1TOY in forum External Engine
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-26-2008, 10:53 PM
  4. Ported FAST 90mm with stock cam!
    By LS1TOY in forum GTO
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-20-2008, 02:13 AM
  5. Can't find stock spring rate-need help fast!
    By third_shift|studios in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-31-2006, 11:34 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •