Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: 85mm maf question
-
04-27-2011, 10:47 AM #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Upstate, SC
- Posts
- 76
Black- 1999 camaro
85mm maf question
I bought my car with a Pace "calibrated" 85mm truck maf. I always noticed a pause/hesitation in acceleration around 2500 rpm. One day I decided to put a stock one on that I had laying around. No more hesitation after that and it felt like it pulled better. But the 85mm maf nets about 1-2 mpg better.
I see a lot of people run these. Has anyone else had a similar problem with them?
BTW: the maf tables were not altered from stock when the first owner had it dyno tuned by speed inc.1995 Z28 A4: 353 LT1 Heads/Cam/Stall, awaiting !opti or !LT1
1999 SS M6: Pacesetter Longtubes, SLP 2otl catback, E-cutout, 218/218 .563 .563 112lsa cam, Ls6 injectors, Ls6 intake, 85mm maf, Whisper lid, Pro 5.0, 4.10 gears, UMI sfc, Founders LCA & PHB, Tuned by v8muscle.net
-
04-27-2011, 11:37 AM #2
You really need to get it retuned, for that MAFS, otherwise it throws everything off.
I had the same problem years ago (+6) and just went back to a stock MAFS since I couldn't justify getting it tuned just for the MAFS.
-
04-27-2011, 11:51 AM #3
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Upstate, SC
- Posts
- 76
Black- 1999 camaro
Yea I'm not wasting money for that. I'll continue to run the stocker. I was just wondering if it was just mine or if others had this issue.
-
04-28-2011, 06:21 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- North of the Motorcity
- Posts
- 2,612
Custom Swirly Black- 2001 WS6 M6
Honestly, you won't see many people doing a MAF mod. As mentioned before, it really isn't worth the minimal gains. A smooth bellow has 10x the bang for the buck versus a bigger/modded maf.
-
04-28-2011, 07:17 AM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Thornton, CO
- Posts
- 23,773
Red Tint Jewelcoat- 2008 Trailblazer SS
That aftermarket MAF leans you out....thus gaining power.
But not safely.
It is basically how they all operate.2008 Trailblazer SS
Yank PTB3600, Kooks 1 7/8" LT's, 4" intake, E-fans, Magnaflow, Sonnax kit, tranny cooler, tune.
Lowered, HID's, tinted.
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 SOLD
531.1 RWHP 481.3 FT/Pounds all motor.
-
04-28-2011, 08:20 AM #6
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Upstate, SC
- Posts
- 76
Black- 1999 camaro
-
04-28-2011, 08:06 PM #7
-
04-28-2011, 09:56 PM #8
-
04-29-2011, 09:12 AM #9
-
04-29-2011, 09:53 AM #10
That is correct, you have to go in and recalibrate your MAF tables with the larger MAF so it reads the air correctly. That can't be done however until your VE tables are correct.
In the end it's a small HP gain, but most won't go through the cost of the MAF and the tuning.
Those of us with our own tuning software, it's not a big deal
I recently removed the MAF and went SD. I love it. Much better throttle response, more to my liking. No more MAF's for me.
-
04-29-2011, 01:38 PM #11
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
85mm bbk intake, do i need 85mm throttle body?
By jmatt07 in forum External EngineReplies: 3Last Post: 02-13-2009, 07:15 AM -
Professional Products 85mm Typhoon Polished Intake/85mm TB
By 1QuikWS6 in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 4Last Post: 09-18-2007, 12:40 PM -
ls1 MAF 85mm...
By Labukas19 in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 17Last Post: 10-29-2006, 11:07 AM -
SLP 85mm MAF
By pinky93 in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 18Last Post: 09-15-2006, 04:04 PM -
NX 85mm Throttle Body Question ?
By big e in forum External EngineReplies: 0Last Post: 09-03-2006, 07:23 PM
Bookmarks