Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Member 98maro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    north bay california
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,973

    Black
    00 camaro ss M6 #6695

    Springs or shocks,?

    Hello.
    I have a question. My car was lowered 1.5 inches.
    I bought it like that. But I noticed that the passenger side it's lower than the drivers side.
    You can tell the diference. But I dnt knw why is dat and also the front is the same.
    Some guys told me it could be the springs. Or the shocks
    anybody has an idea what could be the problem? Do I need new shocks?
    Thanks

  2. #2
    Just me Y2KPewterSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Broken Arrow, OK
    Age
    49
    Posts
    23,345

    Pewter metallic
    2000 Camaro SS

    There have been several cases, internet threads etc. about this issue. Its fairly common. There are lots of theories on the reasons/causes of it as well. Do you know if it was uneven like this prior to the lowering springs?

  3. #3
    Senior Member 98maro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    north bay california
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,973

    Black
    00 camaro ss M6 #6695

    I dnt knw if it was like this with the previous springs
    cuz it had diz ones when I bought the car
    but most of cars I seen have the same problem.
    But I dnt knw how to fix it.
    I dnt like how it look

  4. #4
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    I'm confused...can you re-type that?

  5. #5
    Senior Member 98maro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    north bay california
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,973

    Black
    00 camaro ss M6 #6695

    I mean.
    My car was lowered 1.5 inches. With aftermarket springs
    but the drivers side is higher than the passenger side.
    I dnt why. And it's like 1 inch diference
    so I dnt knw if I need new springs or shocks.
    When I bought the car it was like that

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    1,623

    silver
    2000 formula

    new spring time

  7. #7
    Senior Member 98maro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    north bay california
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,973

    Black
    00 camaro ss M6 #6695

    What's a good option? Any brand in specific

  8. #8
    LSX whore allbaugh_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Age
    38
    Posts
    5,894

    Pewter
    2000 Z28 Camaro

    Get Strano springs. Most people love the stance and they ride decent.

    Google: Sam Strano

    They are not that expensive.

    You could also get some Bilstein HD shocks through him.

    All this might set you back 600 or so.

  9. #9
    Blown, Stroked, & Sprayed

    Ed Blown Vert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    51,364

    Black
    383 Procharged & N20 Vert

    I always understood the driver-side would be a bit higher to allow for the driver.

  10. #10
    O U 8 1 2 Spaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    over here...
    Age
    45
    Posts
    25,709

    []D [] []V[] []D
    1999 trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Blown Vert View Post
    I always understood the driver-side would be a bit higher to allow for the driver.
    should be an inch though... only a 1/4" or so...

  11. #11
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    36
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    well since you said most you see are like that ..i would think it is normal..i doubt it is an inch. as ed said..these cars tend to sit a tad higher on the drivers side. On top of that...most lowering springs will start to sag and throw the stance off...i know that strano's springs will not do that..i currently have them on my car..they look great and the stance is great...a difference in height per side is not noticeable if at all present with my set up.

  12. #12
    King 0f n00bz shady milkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Shepherd, Michigan
    Age
    36
    Posts
    11,770

    blacker than wesleysnipes
    98' trans am

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Blown Vert View Post
    I always understood the driver-side would be a bit higher to allow for the driver.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spaz View Post
    should be an inch though... only a 1/4" or so...
    both of you are correcto-mundo

  13. #13
    Just me Y2KPewterSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Broken Arrow, OK
    Age
    49
    Posts
    23,345

    Pewter metallic
    2000 Camaro SS

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Blown Vert View Post
    I always understood the driver-side would be a bit higher to allow for the driver.
    Thats the most common theory I have always heard too.

  14. #14
    Member DaddySS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bergen Co. NJ
    Posts
    591

    Black
    2000 Camaro SS Conv.

    Up to 1/2 inch is normal. More than that is springs problem. BMR, Strano, Hotchkis, Vogtland, Eibach are popular choices depending on your requirements.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,083

    SOM
    2002 SS

    Could be an install error or improper positioning of the spring. if it was lowered by cutting the spring then it may not have been cut the same as the other side. SPring determines ride height not the shocks so you can rule those out.

  16. #16
    None Shall Pass Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    East of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,827

    Black
    99 WS.6 - Modified

    This is the reasoning I've heard from the shop that built mine - it's set for drag racing - when you launch the car the main amount of torque transfers to the rear passenger side of the car. By having a pre-loaded spring on that side, you have less compression of the spring, allowing for quicker launch. Instead of the car taking time to compress the spring and rebound before launching, the torque is put to the ground instead. Don't know if this is true, but the theory makes sense to me - as it improved my 1/4 mile ets. Granted you also have to have the tire with enough grip to plant the power to the ground and not spin.

    Don't know if it's an inch difference but it is noticeable.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Question: shocks/springs
    By 98maro in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-24-2011, 12:36 AM
  2. Question: shocks n springs
    By 98Bruiser in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-29-2010, 05:07 PM
  3. Help: shocks n springs
    By reaper ws6 in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-11-2010, 01:40 PM
  4. Shocks and Springs
    By ss2000 in forum Suspension and Handling
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 02:46 PM
  5. Stock Springs, Shocks, & Springs
    By Bloodta in forum Parts For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-20-2006, 01:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •