Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: LS1 vs LS2

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jackson, South Carolina
    Posts
    20
    93 Notchback

    LS1 vs LS2

    I am in the market for a Vette. I am not too familiar with the LS2. I am wondering should I save the money and get a pre- 05 vette or should I get the 05 up model. Is the power worth it? What about stock tuning issues etc? I am very familiar with the LS1 so I lean toward that but if the Ls2 is more of a beast... I just don't know. I have never driven an LS2 powered car so I personally dont know. I have seen LS2 powered cars run 13's at the track(what my LS1 ran stock 13.50's). Thoughts and experiences please.
    Sold- 2001 SS 11.87 @120.5 Mph 465 rwhp 613 ft lbs of tq (gas).NOW: 93 5.0 Notchback, 347 stroker daily driver with A/C and P/S. Lentech Tranny 3000 stall, MT Drag radials. 11.91@113 on motor.-10.90's @ 123(1.51 60'), on a little 75 dry shot. 345 rwhp(motor)- 426 rwhp on gas.

  2. #2
    Junior Member Bigjohn366's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    topeka kansas
    Posts
    23

    red
    ls? that is the answer

    id go all out an get the c6 , the head up feature is something all alone just 2 buy it ,

    they dont make ls1s anymore so i would think the ls2 is just bigger an better

  3. #3
    Rice Killa JwMonE99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Myrtle Beach
    Age
    33
    Posts
    5,560

    Black With T-Tops
    96 Z28 M6

    If you got the money go for the LS2

  4. #4
    silver2002Z
    Guest
    if ya got the money go for the LS7 !!!

  5. #5
    Pathelogical Liar BlackLT1Z28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Missouri
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,476

    Black
    94 Camaro Z28

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjohn366 View Post
    id go all out an get the c6 , the head up feature is something all alone just 2 buy it ,

    they dont make ls1s anymore so i would think the ls2 is just bigger an better
    The C5's also had the HUD ya know.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jackson, South Carolina
    Posts
    20
    93 Notchback

    Money isn't the issue. Why go with the LS2? What is the performance vs the LS1? I know 400hp factory rated etc. I am talking rwhp and 1/4 track times / mph

  7. #7
    Pathelogical Liar BlackLT1Z28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Missouri
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,476

    Black
    94 Camaro Z28

    Big positive is it (LS2) has more cubes. That goes a long way when modding. Basically though, the LS1 and LS2 are built on the same architecture with only, really, minor differences. But I read an article of just a cam swap on an LS2 and it gave it an extra 90hp at the crank. It was in GMHTP mag.

  8. #8
    M6 King Hot Black Trans-Am's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    5,085
    Blog Entries
    1

    09 EclipseGT 75 Chevy 4x4
    2001 Trans-Am 13 F-XT

    If you go with C5 go with a Z06. The C6 is much faster than a base C5. I drove a C6 Z51 and loved it. If I had the money I would have bought it. By far the best car that I have drove. The LS2 is already 50 horse ahead of the LS1 and you can do all the same stuff to it to get more power.

  9. #9
    Senior Member INMY01TA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Marylandistan
    Posts
    5,761

    Black
    2001 Trans Am (sold)

    ls2

  10. #10
    Slower Than a 3rd Gen juiced99ws6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cape Coral, FL
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,100

    Mystic Teal
    99 Trans Am & 01 CBR 929

    Get the LS2 vette if you can afford it. it would be much better for you in the long run if you are looking to modify it. check out all the new GM performance parts. you can snag some l92 heads and an l76 intake manifold which my room mate just got in the mail today for under 1500$ and you are talking about a combo that outflows any aftermarket setup on the market for a fraction of the cost. you can spend 2,000$ in parts and have a 500rwhp C6... With the LS1 it is also possible but you are lacking displacement, if you wanted heads that flowed as well as a set of 800$ L92s then you would have to spend 3,000$ on some AFRs.. just an example. GM has just flooded the market with performance options for the LS2

  11. #11
    no more 4th gen secondgearscratch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,460

    Pewter
    2000 z28

    go with the ls2....everyone is right, more cubes, newer, and hey, its a c6.
    its kind of like deciding whether to go lt1 or ls1 a few years ago (kinda). you like one, but the other is newer, more powerful and seems to make more sense. oh and then theres a little thing called a warranty. and 100,000 cant be beat, unless you want a hyundai.....

  12. #12
    Senior Member greatwhiteZ28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    d
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,661

    white
    2002 z28

    whats the displasiment for the LS2

  13. #13
    Slower Than a 3rd Gen juiced99ws6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cape Coral, FL
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,100

    Mystic Teal
    99 Trans Am & 01 CBR 929

    6.0 liter about 364 ci

  14. #14
    Nitrous Tuner LS2Tuner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WestCoast AZ-CALI
    Posts
    4,704

    Silver
    05 Goat SMASHED

    Quote Originally Posted by 2001SSZ28 View Post
    Money isn't the issue. Why go with the LS2? What is the performance vs the LS1? I know 400hp factory rated etc. I am talking rwhp and 1/4 track times / mph
    For the simple fact that THERE IS NO SUBSITUTE FOR CUBIC INCHES!!

    In my experiance they (LS2's) are alot more fun to drive on the street. The tq gain through out the power band is AWSOME!!
    Thats with real tires not stock radials.
    I'll say your looking at 3-4 tenths at least.
    I've also found the LS2 likes more bottle also.
    The power curve is alot more steady vs. the 5.7 is more like a spike. Hard to explain in words on the computer.
    I would blow off 10's all day with the LS2 and 11.30's in the LS1 to throw you some #'s.
    Thats my 2 cents..


    Don't be afraid of the bottle!!! Be afraid of your tune!!!

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jackson, South Carolina
    Posts
    20
    93 Notchback

    Ls2tuner, juiced99 thanks for the insight. What do you see the Ls2's lay down in rwhp numbers. Tuner, I know exactly what you mean by the "spike" in an Ls1. Look at my tq. numbers on a 125 shot and simple bolt ons. The best Ls1 numbers on a stock car i ever saw on a chasis dyno was 326 rwhp on a bone stock 2001 T.A. An old guy brought it to my buddy's shop and saw the dy no and wanted to try it out (he knew nothing about cars). I remember he said "IS that pretty good?" All of us were like man whenever you sell that car call us. Anyway, sorry to get off topic.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •