Dynoed again My 2000 Z28

[tx77015ls1]

I just went to MTI here in Houston<texas to run on there Dynojet. I did 314 HP and 327 ft. lbs. torque.

A few weeks ago, I had it dunoed on a Mustang dyno and did 316 HP. I ran 93 octane

The only differance this time I added a SLP smooth belows, RLCA (Should be on factor on dyno) and this time I had to run 87 octane gass cuz the gas station was out of 93.

I almost have 94,000 miles and only have the mods in my sig.

Does 87 octane gas make a real big differance on power compared to 93 octane on the dynoes?

Thanks, Jason

[SeVeReDiStOrTiOn]

yes

[Danger731]

ouch, 87 !

[Liquifire]

yes

+2 and also you should have noticed a bigger difference going from a mustang chassis dyno to a dynojet.........but the gas will make quite a difference.

[GottaHaveLS1]

I would never put 87 in.... remember, she's not a woman, treat her right.

[skar]

mustang dynos should post lower numbers then a dyno jet from what i have been told.

[oneBADDz]

HAHAHAHAHA, might become my new sig
------------------------------------------------------------

I would never put 87 in.... remember, she's not a woman, treat her right.

[tx77015ls1]

I had to put 87 in it. When I got to the gas station my car started to stall. The station only had 87 they were out of 93.

I wonder what it would have dynoed if I had 93 in it if the Mustang dyno said 316 and that was before the SLP smooth bellows.


thanks

[SeVeReDiStOrTiOn]

I would never put 87 in.... remember, she's not a woman, treat her right.

[GottaHaveLS1]

I had to put 87 in it. When I got to the gas station my car started to stall. The station only had 87 they were out of 93.

I wonder what it would have dynoed if I had 93 in it if the Mustang dyno said 316 and that was before the SLP smooth bellows.


thanks

It would have been a minimal difference. 5 hp maybe.