Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

13.57 @ 106 N/a Wtf?

This is a discussion on 13.57 @ 106 N/a Wtf? within the Drag Racing forums, part of the Racing Forums category; Went to Highschool drag day at Maple Grove This past sunday and was disappointed. My best run was 1/4 - ...

  1. #1
    Insane WinSomeLoseNone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    PA - Montgomery County
    Posts
    185

    Black
    2000 Camaro Z28 M6

    13.57 @ 106 N/a Wtf?

    Went to Highschool drag day at Maple Grove This past sunday and was disappointed. My best run was
    1/4 - 13.57
    MPH - 106
    R/T - .26
    All the other runs were about the same. I was running N/A as this was the first time I tracked the car and didnt want to spray so i could get a baseline. With this time I was in the top 10 out of 300 cars. Although after reading around It seems this was a slow time. I had a great launch and chirped every shift (didn't believe it till I saw the vid). Am I running ok times with the small mods ive got. Remeber this was running N/A no N2O.

    Any guesses on what ill run with a 125 wet shot through a TB plate(hits much harder than a nozzle).
    Last edited by WinSomeLoseNone; 05-02-2006 at 06:25 AM.
    2000 Z28 m6
    Current Mods-GMMG catback-UMI Diamond SFC's-Pacesetter LT's-ORY-HSW Wet Shot-Pro 5.0-Rebuilt Race Trans-Spec3+-Pacesetter LT's-FRA mod-TBBypass-Whisper Lid-

  2. #2
    Member Mach1Mustang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    203

    Blue
    04 Mach 1

    Those times are not to bad, but what is your 60' time. Your mph should be good for a 13.2-13.3 at least.

  3. #3
    Insane WinSomeLoseNone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    PA - Montgomery County
    Posts
    185

    Black
    2000 Camaro Z28 M6

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach1Mustang
    Those times are not to bad, but what is your 60' time. Your mph should be good for a 13.2-13.3 at least.
    Im actually at school at the moment.... thats from memory im gonna post up a pic of the timeslip tonight when i get home.
    Oh and fastest car at the track was a older mazda RX7???? WTF it was in the 11's

    This is at a highschool student only on street tires only (no DOT DR's) competition.

  4. #4
    Beast
    Guest
    You did good. You have to be a VERY good driver to be in the 12's with regular all season tires. When I go on my street tires I usually run 13.1 @ 109-110 mph cutting 2.2 short times.

  5. #5
    Member Capster78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Newport News Va
    Age
    39
    Posts
    578

    Silver
    1998 WS6 M6

    Thats not bad at all man. Just looks like you need some seat time. Your not gana jump into a car like this and click off some bests the first night out.

  6. #6
    Insane WinSomeLoseNone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    PA - Montgomery County
    Posts
    185

    Black
    2000 Camaro Z28 M6

    Thanks for the support. Im heading back the next two weeks in a row. I've never had so much fun, im completely addicted to the whole track experience. I cant wait to see what I run while spraying. Well AFTER I get a new clutch. Mine slips only when I spray.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    115

    Supersonic Blue
    2012 Z06

    Looks like the new 3 valve Mustangs have the stock LS1 beat. My 06 ran a 13.42 @ 101.80 mph. I did have an ASP underdrive pulley but other wise stock.

    Better watch out for those new stangs!
    2012 Z06
    08 Corvette 10.88 @ 125.25 mph(sold)
    98 Camaro 10.79 @ 122.64 mph, 1.44 60'(sold)

  8. #8
    Member ttocs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    jim thorpe, pa
    Age
    28
    Posts
    176

    black
    98 z28 m6

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry
    Looks like the new 3 valve Mustangs have the stock LS1 beat. My 06 ran a 13.42 @ 101.80 mph. I did have an ASP underdrive pulley but other wise stock.

    Better watch out for those new stangs!
    A 13.4 but only 101mph???

  9. #9
    Member Mach1Mustang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    203

    Blue
    04 Mach 1

    the new stangs are killer out of the hole when properly driven!!

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    115

    Supersonic Blue
    2012 Z06

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach1Mustang
    the new stangs are killer out of the hole when properly driven!!
    Not sure I would call my stang's 60' a killer but it was a 2.011. With a loose converter and traction it might be considered killer for a stock engine in a car that weighs 3620#.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Long Valley, NJ
    Posts
    67

    Black
    2002 Camaro Z-28

    Last friday i ran my car at the track for the first time. I have 275 BFG's on my '02 z-28...i ran a 13.7@ 103.44mph... thats with everything stock my reaction time blows tho.

  12. #12
    Green Monkey
    Guest
    Sounds like you did very good, especially with street tires. Chirping the tires will actually cost you a bit of time. Get some drag radials and that time will definitely go down. I loved it when I got mine, I used to chirp them all the time with street tires, but when I put the drag radials on and she hooked on my 1-2 shift it really helped my time.

  13. #13
    ruff ruff rotwiler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    WA State
    Age
    51
    Posts
    481

    LT's, 3400 stall, FIPK,CB
    2002 Z28

    My car ran with a Lid 13.54 @ around 106, so is a normal time for the F bodies. Now I am running 12.6's @ 106 with a 1.695 60 foot n/a.

  14. #14
    Senior Member INMY01TA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The great red state of MD.
    Posts
    5,755

    Black
    2001 Trans Am (sold)

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry
    Looks like the new 3 valve Mustangs have the stock LS1 beat. My 06 ran a 13.42 @ 101.80 mph. I did have an ASP underdrive pulley but other wise stock.

    Better watch out for those new stangs!

  15. #15
    Looking for new Fbody
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Age
    38
    Posts
    74
    that's not too bad, seems about right for these cars. I took my 2000 SS 6spd a few weeks ago and only managed a 13.65 @ 106.3 with a 2.3 60'

    In the early stages, I just look at the trap speed to see if the car actually has the power it should then I start tweaking it with different mods (tires, suspension, weight, etc) to get the short times down.

    Seat time, seat time, seat time is the best tool/mod.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Age
    44
    Posts
    182

    Black
    2001 Trans Am WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry
    Looks like the new 3 valve Mustangs have the stock LS1 beat. My 06 ran a 13.42 @ 101.80 mph. I did have an ASP underdrive pulley but other wise stock.

    Better watch out for those new stangs!


    That's comedy. They run 14's over here.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    115

    Supersonic Blue
    2012 Z06

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob'sWS6


    That's comedy. They run 14's over here.
    There are a few Mustange owners that don't know how to drive. Mine ran a 13.42! Maybe this ASP pulley gave it over .6 improvement because that's all that was done to it.

  18. #18
    Visualize°Design°Create SSwt00SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    9,287

    '12 Silver SS 1SS
    '00 Black SS #8617

    no pulley set up i know of drops any 1/4 mile et by .6 seconds. pulley set ups are about $150-200. that would mean more HP and TQ gains than from headers and ory. if that were the case, who would spend $500+ for headers, etc for a .3 second faster time when you could supposedly spend a fraction of that and gain twice as much?! im calling BS on the .6 second pulley gain claim...
    2000 SS - The Wicked Witch: °°Cammed 'n Slammed°° 458rwhp/410rwtq
    Quote Originally Posted by Bowtie_girl30
    I was hoping to just hump her up the exhaust cause she is so damn sexy....
    "Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    115

    Supersonic Blue
    2012 Z06

    Quote Originally Posted by SSwt00SS
    no pulley set up i know of drops any 1/4 mile et by .6 seconds. pulley set ups are about $150-200. that would mean more HP and TQ gains than from headers and ory. if that were the case, who would spend $500+ for headers, etc for a .3 second faster time when you could supposedly spend a fraction of that and gain twice as much?! im calling BS on the .6 second pulley gain claim...
    Exactly my point, the pulley did not yield a .6 improvement. Something else is involved here! Whether it be driver, weather, tranny or weight of cars difference something made theirs run in the 14s if mine will run a 13.42.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Age
    44
    Posts
    182

    Black
    2001 Trans Am WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry
    Exactly my point, the pulley did not yield a .6 improvement. Something else is involved here! Whether it be driver, weather, tranny or weight of cars difference something made theirs run in the 14s if mine will run a 13.42.
    You must've gone to one of those downhill tracks.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •