Results 1 to 20 of 24
-
10-28-2007, 01:37 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Springfield
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 326
Silver- 2004 SVT Cobra
Z28 vs Evo 8 vs single turbo supra
Raced some guy in a red Evo 8 last night on the highway. He had all the basic bolt ons, plus a boost controller. We went from 50 and i initially pulled away, then i heard his turbo spool up and he stayed at my bumber until about 90 then i started to pull away pretty good. put about 3 cars on him by 130. We pulled over later but he didnt want to talk though, and just sat in his car with the windows up, which i thought was kinda odd. He did have a girl in the car, which may have had something to do with it. My car has the K&N intake kit and a Flowmaster catback.
The second was a guy in a NA supra with a single turbo kit. I didnt really race him myself, a friend in his mustang GT tried to though, and lost badly of course. I stayed behind the guy in the supra when he took off, I wasnt able to close the gap but he wasnt able to pull away either. Definately would have been close though. Everytime he changed gears his car would shoot flames out the tailpipe, not normal but definately looked cool. He said he was running about 15 psi of boost.
-
10-28-2007, 03:49 PM #2
-
10-28-2007, 04:58 PM #3
-
10-28-2007, 05:06 PM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Springfield
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 326
Silver- 2004 SVT Cobra
An NA supra with a turbo kit is a supra that started out with no turbo, but now has a turbo. There a big difference between installing a turbo onto a NA supra compared to doing the same to a TT.
-
10-28-2007, 05:18 PM #5
-
10-28-2007, 05:49 PM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Springfield
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 326
Silver- 2004 SVT Cobra
But after you put a turbo on it, its not NA. Instead of saying a NA supra with a single turbo on it, he should have said a single turbo supra.
-
10-29-2007, 11:20 AM #7
that is very true... HE HAS A POINT... because if you ask any Supra Owner, (and I go through their Forums)... they never call a car that was previously N/A... just a TURBO CAR...they always enphasize the fact that it used to be the N/A... because it has difrent compression ratios, diffrent gearing...and it all around a weaker engine... with those 15lbs I'd guess nearly 400whp? ... I mean if a TT car on low Comp. goes to 380whp on 18lbs (without supporting bolt-ons) ...
WHAT ARE YOUR MODS!?
-
10-29-2007, 12:27 PM #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,154
Red- 2000 Trans Am
Yes but if you start with a Twin turbo supra and put a single turbo kit on it there would only be one difference in performance, that is that the N/A supra came with slightly larger cams. Mine is a turbo motor but i had the N/A cams in it for a while, added around 20rwhp on mine. Most people put the N/A cams in, those cams if you forge the internals and put a huge turbo on there really dont need to be changed out until you wanna make more than 800rwhp.
-
10-29-2007, 04:46 PM #9
-
10-29-2007, 04:47 PM #10
Oh and btw, on the supra forums I think they call this particular type of supra a "N/A-T"
-
10-29-2007, 04:48 PM #11
-
10-29-2007, 05:21 PM #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Springfield
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 326
Silver- 2004 SVT Cobra
The guy said he was making around 380 at the wheels, which is definately more than i have. I only have an air intake and a flowmaster exhaust, and my car is a Manual. He said his best quarter mile time with hard launching was 12.7, So had i actually lined up next to him he probally would have won by a small margin.
-
10-29-2007, 07:01 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- New Orleans Suburbs
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 140
White- '02 Formula A4
Nice runs man.
A N/A supra with a turbo put on it is called a NA-T. They do it all the time, its getting more popular by the day. The Non Turbo supra's 5 spd can hold about 400whp and the rear end can hold a little more.
-
10-29-2007, 07:08 PM #14
-
10-29-2007, 08:00 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- New Orleans Suburbs
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 140
White- '02 Formula A4
A friend of mine with a NA-T supra is pushing 17psi and dyno'd at 34?whp. I doubt hes making 380 something.
-
10-30-2007, 07:10 AM #16
-
10-30-2007, 07:17 AM #17
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Winter Garden, FL
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 2,061
Black- 1999 Camaro Z28
The NA motors are extremely capable of those numbers with supporting mods but of course the most crucial point is the TUNE.
-
10-30-2007, 07:39 AM #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,154
Red- 2000 Trans Am
What you also have to remember about supras is they arent light, they are smaller than our cars and weigh almost 3800lbs, and the psi thing is true, you really need to know the trim of the turbo
-
10-31-2007, 07:14 PM #19
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Fort Benning, GA
- Age
- 42
- Posts
- 435
Black- '91 turbo fox, '97 vette
This may be semantics, but I feel the need to clarify anyway. "Air flow" is proportional to boost in a given engine. 18 psi from one turbo will flow the same volume of air as 18psi from any other turbo on the same engine. The only reason one will not make as much power as the other is because they fall into different efficiency ranges. A turbo maxed out at 18 psi on said engine will be off of its efficiency island for the compressor and/or turbine wheels. So, it'll take more power away from the engine to spin, and it'll also be producing hotter air. Hotter air, as we know, is less dense, has less oxygen and thus is not capable of producing as much power.
-
11-01-2007, 09:00 AM #20
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,154
Red- 2000 Trans Am
Ok so you are telling me, if you run 18psi on a supra with a 67trim you are flowing the same amount of air if you ran 18psi on a 76trim. I dont think so, the whole point of being efficient is getting more air flow. A bigger whole will flow more air, not to mention you saying a bigger turbo takes more power away from the motor, either im misunderstanding you or you are just silly. Thats why when they say bigger trim that pretty much goes hand in hand with a more efficient turbo
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Corvette Z06 vs T88 Single Turbo Toyota Supra
By trev0006 in forum CorvetteReplies: 0Last Post: 02-27-2009, 11:40 PM -
WTT: Turbo Supra for F-body 6MT
By IRACEMYCOPCAR in forum Vehicles For Sale / TradeReplies: 8Last Post: 10-19-2008, 09:33 AM -
LT1 94 T/A vs a MK3 turbo supra
By Toyota h8r in forum Kill StoriesReplies: 18Last Post: 04-04-2007, 06:57 PM -
01 Z06 vs. 99 c5,Turbo TransAm vs.T67 Supra
By 427TTA4 in forum Multimedia SectionReplies: 0Last Post: 02-16-2007, 02:33 PM -
Me VS. 6.0 truck and Single Turbo supra
By Stone in forum Kill StoriesReplies: 2Last Post: 08-29-2006, 03:22 PM
Bookmarks