Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36
  1. #1
    Senior Member Musclefan21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,156

    1997 Formula & 2003 cobra

    Thumbs up killed a modded charger srt-8. "Video"

    I don't know his mods but as you can hear, he got at least exhaust.

    http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...5e0011347a.htm

  2. #2
    Yo Da Lin The Valley..... astyles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    here
    Posts
    3,889
    2001

    nice kill!

  3. #3
    member kwade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pontotoc,MS
    Posts
    134

    black
    1998 ram air m6 ws6

    Thought str-8's were faster than that?It didn't run but a 14.0

  4. #4
    Member patricksd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Oceanside, CA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    141

    Navy Blue Metallic
    2001 Camaro Z28 M6 T-Top

    They do run a lot faster than 14.0s. The guy either didn't launch correctly, it was his first time at the track, or he had horrible traction. Not that the SRT8 would be running high 11's, but more like mid to high 12's.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Street Lethal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by doodad
    11.74@122.8mph w/ 1.81 60'
    Something wrong with that track's clock? You should be running much faster than a 11.74 with that trap and sixty foot....

  6. #6
    Senior Member Musclefan21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,156

    1997 Formula & 2003 cobra
    Quote Originally Posted by Street Lethal View Post
    Something wrong with that track's clock? You should be running much faster than a 11.74 with that trap and sixty foot....
    yeah the trap is good for mid-low 11s. i did 2 passes only that day.

    first run that^^^ and second run 11.76@122.1mph with 1.73 60' i blew the alternator after i shifted to 3rd and kinda paniced and let go and got back on the car and ran slower times than my best. i even ran .1 faster on 1/8 mile. that was my 11.6-5 run right there

    yeah that charger could have run better than that but i doubt he would be anywhere close to mid 12s. I would still murder him even if he would have run low 12s

  7. #7
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,154

    Red
    2000 Trans Am

    What track is that at?

  8. #8
    Senior Member Musclefan21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,156

    1997 Formula & 2003 cobra
    Quote Originally Posted by 2000T/A Guru View Post
    What track is that at?
    Great Lakes Dragway union grove, WI

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    San Jose area
    Posts
    273

    Silver
    06 Charger SRT-8

    Dude, great times, cool car but SURELY you raced something faster than a lousy driver running a 14.0 in low 13sec car??

    Thats like me posting a V6 Mustang kill on the Bimmerforums!

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    loyall ky
    Posts
    347

    black, and black
    04 M6

    charger

    yea but u posting a v6 kill is all u can do, u cant get a video of a charger killing anything else. lol

  11. #11
    Senior Member Musclefan21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,156

    1997 Formula & 2003 cobra
    i think his 60' killed him, he cut 2.3 60 and i did 1.8

  12. #12
    Member Redegal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    50
    Posts
    281

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro SS SLP M6

    Nice kill. Does your Cobra still have the stock SC on it? I'm fascinated at how fast those cars can go.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Musclefan21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,156

    1997 Formula & 2003 cobra
    Quote Originally Posted by Redegal View Post
    Nice kill. Does your Cobra still have the stock SC on it? Just curious what you can get out of those cars with the stock SC.
    yes, i still have the stock blower. there are some ran 10.9x with stock supercharger, stock rear, 6 speed, full weight.

    on this run as you see i launched it easy and cut 1.8 60' ran 11.74. with harder launch like 1.5x - 1.6x 60' the car can go 11.5- 11.4s with only 4 mods i have. if i port the blower and throtle body thats another 40rwhp and get a lower pulley and another 30-40rwtq and wth good driving 10s isn't far but low low 11s with stock blower is easy!

  14. #14
    Member Redegal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    50
    Posts
    281

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro SS SLP M6

    That's fast and with that kind of MPH I wouldn't think 10's would be too hard to accomplish.
    2002 SS M6 Convertible

  15. #15
    Senior Member Musclefan21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,156

    1997 Formula & 2003 cobra
    Quote Originally Posted by Redegal View Post
    That's fast and with that kind of MPH I wouldn't think 10's would be too hard to accomplish.
    that mph is out of only pulley, intake , exhaust. which is impressive if you ask me since the car weights 3870lbs with me in it.

    with port, lower pulley, heat exchanger, good weather with will trap high 120s easy

  16. #16
    Internet Police
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    350

    Black
    2003 Mustang Cobra

    "11.74@122.8mph w/ 1.81 60"
    something is wrong with that clock,either the MPH or the time. with that MPH and 60' it should have been something closer to 10.9X. if your car really ran an 11.74, then the MPH should be closer to 116MPH judging by that 60' time.

  17. #17
    Member Redegal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    50
    Posts
    281

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro SS SLP M6

    Quote Originally Posted by TrickStang37 View Post
    "11.74@122.8mph w/ 1.81 60"
    something is wrong with that clock,either the MPH or the time. with that MPH and 60' it should have been something closer to 10.9X. if your car really ran an 11.74, then the MPH should be closer to 116MPH judging by that 60' time.
    My brother ran an 11.3 in his GN and trapped 117MPH. That's seems about right.
    He might be losing time somewhere else like between shifts? Alot of folks on the Buick board are running high 11's with the same 112 MPH trap speed as me and I can't get out of the 12's even with a 1.6 second 60' time. Go figure.

  18. #18
    Member Redegal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    50
    Posts
    281

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro SS SLP M6

    Quote Originally Posted by TrickStang37 View Post
    "11.74@122.8mph w/ 1.81 60"
    something is wrong with that clock,either the MPH or the time. with that MPH and 60' it should have been something closer to 10.9X. if your car really ran an 11.74, then the MPH should be closer to 116MPH judging by that 60' time.
    My brother ran an 11.3@117 in his GN and I thought that was about right. Maybe the OP is losing time between shifts? Also, alot of the folks on the Buick board are running high 11's with the same trap speed as me but I can't get out of the 12's even with a 1.6 second 60' time. Go figure.

  19. #19
    Internet Police
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    350

    Black
    2003 Mustang Cobra

    maybe youre losing a lil time somewhere too, anyways have you tried going to a different track?i would think that with a 112MPH trap and 1.6' 60' you MIGHT be closer to an 11.6-11.8 but anyways estimates sometimes tend to get skewed when the 60' drops below the 1.8 range.also, i dont mean to sound like an ass but i dont think i fully understood your post,were you agreeing with me or disagreeing? also,what was your brothers 60' time? 1.7?
    Last edited by TrickStang37; 07-14-2007 at 08:21 PM.

  20. #20
    Member Redegal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    50
    Posts
    281

    Pewter
    2001 Camaro SS SLP M6

    Quote Originally Posted by TrickStang37 View Post
    i dont mean to sound like an ass but i dont think i fully understood your post,were you agreeing with me or disagreeing? also,what was your brothers 60' time? 1.7?
    Huh, good question lol. I guess I'm disagreeing. Maybe there could be other factors involved with a higher ET other than a bad launch. If he gets a good launch but loses time from shifting, he might still be able to accomplish the same MPH but with a higher ET. Hope that makes sense.

    My brother's 60' times average between 1.5-1.7. I think on that 11.3 second run he got a 1.5 60'.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Video of Obama (2008) Doing an "Anthony Weiner" on Airplane
    By wileyCoyote in forum Political / Debate Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-12-2016, 03:59 PM
  2. Feinswine Now Aiming Her Laser at "Violent" Video Games
    By wileyCoyote in forum Political / Debate Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-08-2013, 11:27 AM
  3. Any pictures of your "BFH" modded wheel wells??
    By Baluchitherium in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-02-2010, 05:04 PM
  4. 13yr old kills brother over "whos turn to play video game next"
    By ibanez7 in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-17-2007, 09:08 PM
  5. Got a weekend? "modded civic" 0-70
    By got-a-ls1 in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 04-16-2007, 07:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •