Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 117

How would a 3000 GT VR4 Twin Turbo do against a LT1 or LS1 F-body?

This is a discussion on How would a 3000 GT VR4 Twin Turbo do against a LT1 or LS1 F-body? within the Kill Stories forums, part of the Racing Forums category; Yea hes def not modded except for some underbody neons. I will enjoy this race win or lose heh I ...

  1. #21
    Yea hes def not modded except for some underbody neons.

    I will enjoy this race win or lose heh

    I Plan to do the following by middle/end of summer
    Intake - Not sure maybe SLP or other
    Exhaust - GMMG w/ either GMMG oval tips or Corsa duals
    Longtube headers - Pacesetter
    Y-Pipe - Not Sure
    Wheels/Tires - Not sure
    3.73 gears - maybe, I have 3.23s stock

    Hopefully i can get myself into the low 13s (High 12s ) with that set-up and keep up wit my friends 01 WS6 , i've beat a stock 98 or 99 formula from a stop driver looked crappy with his friend yellin at him for losing lol
    Last edited by White 95 T/A; 04-07-2006 at 07:47 AM.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Ado7610
    Yea hes def not modded except for some underbody neons.


    I hope you wax him just for having those

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by EE1983


    I hope you wax him just for having those
    I will do my best man If I don't beat him now by end of summer I will definately beat him lol

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Long Valley, NJ
    Posts
    67

    Black
    2002 Camaro Z-28

    i wouldnt get too hyped about it yet...i have a 97 vr-4 and a 02 z28. My z is faster than the 3000 cause its got more torque, but you having an A4 might have a little trouble. Heres some specs for the 97-99 vr-4's: 3.0 liter twin turbo V6 DOHC 24-valves, 320 HP @ 6000 rpm, 315 ft-lbs @ 2500 rpm, M6, AWD. It weights roughly 3,750 lbs<--one heavy sucker. If you take him from a stop, he'll rip you a new one. Youll be spinning, and he'll be long gone. If you take him from a roll, you may have a chance. Hope this helps, best of luck to you.

  5. #25
    HUNTER S. THOMPSON FAN Raoul-Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    BURBANK
    Posts
    1,120
    Vr4's Are Dogs Unless Modded Decently, For One They Weigh Close To 4000lbs, Their Awd Helps But Runs Outta Breathe Round 70-80mph, I Took One When My Z Was Stock, His Was Stock Too Of Course, I Would Love To See How Bad They Get Beat If I Raced One Now

  6. #26
    lee1rbc
    Guest
    If Your LT1 is bone stock A4, with avg tires, You will be around a 14.2 car at 98mph. That would be with a 2.15 60ft or better. Stock VR4s run a 13.8 at around 98mph. That would be with a 1.95 60ft or better. (AWD)

    My 95 A4 LT1 Z28 did a best 13.89 at 100mph, with a 2.08 60ft. That was with C/Air, air foil, cat back, alumn D/shaft,pan hard and L/control arms. Still had stock 16s and 3.23s. I also used a tuner to change my shift points to 6,200 and firm shifts.

    My 98 T/A bone stock A4 with 2.73s ran 13.53 at 103mph with a 2.05 60ft.

  7. #27
    HUNTER S. THOMPSON FAN Raoul-Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    BURBANK
    Posts
    1,120
    Quote Originally Posted by lee1rbc
    If Your LT1 is bone stock A4, with avg tires, You will be around a 14.2 car at 98mph. That would be with a 2.15 60ft or better. Stock VR4s run a 13.8 at around 98mph. That would be with a 1.95 60ft or better. (AWD)

    My 95 A4 LT1 Z28 did a best 13.89 at 100mph, with a 2.08 60ft. That was with C/Air, air foil, cat back, alumn D/shaft,pan hard and L/control arms. Still had stock 16s and 3.23s. I also used a tuner to change my shift points to 6,200 and firm shifts.

    My 98 T/A bone stock A4 with 2.73s ran 13.53 at 103mph with a 2.05 60ft.
    his z is a4..ohhh...yeah mine is a m6 when i beat the vr4 i aslo had a cai

  8. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Age
    33
    Posts
    498

    Black
    '05 Ninja ZX-10R

    Completely sure he's stock too, right? A boost controller for him costs $20.

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    3

    black
    1990 eagle talon tsi

    info on the 3000 gt VR4

    My brother has a 1992 3000GT vr4. Stock they run a 13.8 in a QT mile. they weigh a little over 4,000 pounds and run 9 psi stock. Do not run him for top speed the 5 speed will top out at 192mph. im not sure about the 6 speed. if you need anything else let me kno.

  10. #30
    no more 4th gen secondgearscratch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Age
    29
    Posts
    2,463

    Pewter
    2000 z28

    Quote Originally Posted by wickedtalon90 View Post
    My brother has a 1992 3000GT vr4. Stock they run a 13.8 in a QT mile. they weigh a little over 4,000 pounds and run 9 psi stock. Do not run him for top speed the 5 speed will top out at 192mph. im not sure about the 6 speed. if you need anything else let me kno.
    did you happen to notice the date on the last post before yours?

  11. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    3

    black
    1990 eagle talon tsi

    [nope sorry. im new

  12. #32
    no more 4th gen secondgearscratch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Age
    29
    Posts
    2,463

    Pewter
    2000 z28

    Quote Originally Posted by wickedtalon90 View Post
    [nope sorry. im new
    its completely cool.

    try to stay in current threads though...

  13. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    3

    black
    1990 eagle talon tsi

    will do

  14. #34
    Rice Killa JwMonE99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Myrtle Beach
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,561

    Black With T-Tops
    96 Z28 M6

    We never did get results for that race

  15. #35
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,159

    Red
    2000 Trans Am

    Heres is the thing you cant just say your stock lt1 runs a 14.2, my formula with 2.73s ran a 14.2 and he has 3.23s, and i have seen stock autos hit high 13s

  16. #36
    Senior Member Getzen_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,530

    Black
    2000 T/A

    yeah man those VR-4's are wicked fast... especially modded out, my buddy has one, and that thing ran a 12.7 on the stock turbos, with bolt-ons... and he's since added bigger turbos and a shit-load of other stuff...
    It's an LSX killer man(Search For Vids on VR-4 on streetfire, user name is jrod/ raced an ls1 ta, lt1 camaro, WRX w/100 shot, twin Turbo 300zx, Turbo Supra etc.. all kills man)... stock shouldn't be a big deal though, I mean.. they only boost like 8 psi... and like 13.5? they're nice cars, make the shitty SL's look even shittier...
    GOOD LUCK MAN

  17. #37
    LTX N20LT4's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    2,006
    10's N/A

    The outcome of this race can go just about either way. I've seen 3000 VR-4's run mid to high 13's @ 101 and some go 14.1-14.0 @ 98, so it just really depends. If I had to make a guess though, I would probably say in best case scenario for both cars the VR4 would have a bit to much for a stock LT1 A4. Now a 6-speed LT should have no problem going tit for tat if not pulling one.

  18. #38
    no more 4th gen secondgearscratch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Age
    29
    Posts
    2,463

    Pewter
    2000 z28

    3/s platforms suck cock...dont give a shit what anyone says. dont care if you have thousands of videos proving me wrong.

    they suck. end of thread.

    btw...no one actually races when they post about intending to race. get used to it folks.

  19. #39
    The Bandit Wesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,033

    SGM
    1998 Trans Am WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by secondgearscratch View Post
    3/s platforms suck cock...dont give a shit what anyone says. dont care if you have thousands of videos proving me wrong.

    they suck. end of thread.

    btw...no one actually races when they post about intending to race. get used to it folks.
    This man speaks the truth...I've seen some real garbage cars, but the 3/s cars are some of the shittiest vehicles ever made. And that mostly refers to quality.

  20. #40
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    11

    SOM
    98 TA

    Most 3000's are worn out hulks even when you perform standard maintenance on them, thats why you don't see 15 year old mitsu anything around, unless they are low mileage garage kept. My buddy had one that was pretty much representative of whats left of them. 16 in the 1/4 mile. Yea a fresh one back in the day may have been a low 14 cars but the only ones turning those times now have to be modded. On the flip side a old LT-1 car with standard maintenance will run withing a couple of tenths of new.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-16-2009, 01:45 AM
  2. incon twin turbo kit F-body
    By barnat in forum Parts For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-19-2007, 11:19 AM
  3. camaro vs 3000 gt turbo
    By GONZO SS in forum Multimedia Section
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-01-2007, 11:20 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-28-2005, 08:00 PM
  5. twin turbo for f-body
    By RedRamAir2000 in forum Forced Induction
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-17-2005, 12:57 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •