Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29

99 mustang gt

This is a discussion on 99 mustang gt within the Kill Stories forums, part of the Racing Forums category; Originally Posted by Chris Arnold Maybe so. What are ZR1s running, anyway? i think motortrend got an 11.2 out of ...

  1. #21
    Senior Member big hammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    manitoba, canada
    Posts
    1,731

    silver
    2002 ws6

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Arnold View Post
    Maybe so. What are ZR1s running, anyway?
    i think motortrend got an 11.2 out of it? so any competent driver would get in the 10's.

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Benning, GA
    Age
    35
    Posts
    435

    Black
    '91 turbo fox, '97 vette

    Any idea what the trap speed was?

    NVM, I found it. 130.5 mph
    Last edited by Chris Arnold; 04-02-2009 at 08:03 PM.

  3. #23
    Speed Racer 99 Kobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    209

    White
    '04 Mustang Cobra

    Quote Originally Posted by Zinergy View Post
    Proabably pretty good since the vette weighs 1000lbs less.
    The Shelby weighs about 3,900 and the ZR-1 weighs about 3,350.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    3,260

    Arctic White, red/gray
    1997 Corvette, 92 Typhoon

    Most people who ru nthe supersnake on the stock tires cant get into the 11s, and trap around 120, and the lowest time i have seen is a 11.55 @ 124mph. Perhaps the drivers suck but a trap speed of 124 is gonna look silly against the 132mph some drivers have already gotten out of the zr-1. And all the 0-60 times so far recorded on the supersnake say 4.5-4.8. The corvette has been run as low as 3.3 already with stock specs. Over 1 second faster to 60 is painful to see from the mustang owners view. I have driven corvettes( not the zr-1 but ls1, c5 z06 and c6s) for cars with IRS they are amazingly nice at launching.

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Benning, GA
    Age
    35
    Posts
    435

    Black
    '91 turbo fox, '97 vette

    I don't think you're giving the SS enough credit. No car with over 700 hp is only going to be trapping 124. With around 400 rwhp, my mustang ran 118. The Shelby's have gone at least 134 mph (MM&FF). So, I think it's gonna make for a very interesting race. Neither car is going to look silly.

    Chris

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by karpetcm View Post


    That one from hennessey



    This one is from Lingenfelter
    I was kind of disappointed with this. I mean, you can get a bone stock ZR1 into the 10s with just tires. Hell, there have been people that have gotten stock C6 ZO6s into the 10s with just tires. Motortrend did an 11.2@130something mph. That guy Ranger needs to get his hands on one, he'd probably hit 10s on factory tires with it.

    Regardless, don't know why you some of you are comparing ZR1 to GT500. They are completely different classes. The GT500 I would put in the same class as a ZO6. The ZR1 is almost supercar status, with supercar performance.

  7. #27
    cammed & slammed Kaotic_ws6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Jacksonville Tx
    Age
    26
    Posts
    983

    Black
    2002 ws6 (6 speed)

    Quote Originally Posted by Superluminal View Post
    I was kind of disappointed with this. I mean, you can get a bone stock ZR1 into the 10s with just tires. Hell, there have been people that have gotten stock C6 ZO6s into the 10s with just tires. Motortrend did an 11.2@130something mph. That guy Ranger needs to get his hands on one, he'd probably hit 10s on factory tires with it.

    Regardless, don't know why you some of you are comparing ZR1 to GT500. They are completely different classes. The GT500 I would put in the same class as a ZO6. The ZR1 is almost supercar status, with supercar performance.
    +1
    1999 mbm Z m6/ forged 346, lt's, wires, ls6 intake, sts rear turbo.

    *SOLD*2002 black ws6- <Bolt ons, ls6 heads, mild cam, dyno tune, full susp. and 4.10s> --440rwhp/395rwtq

  8. #28
    Senior Member BLKCLOUD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,100

    B2300 (Fluffy) Retired
    Plain-Jane Dodge Truck

    I wouldn't put the GT500 anywhere near the same class as the Z06. Beyond 4 wheels and a similar factory power rating, they are VERY different cars. And the Z06 is much more capable at everything except the number of people it can carry.

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    36

    Windveil Blue
    2008 Ford Mustang GT

    Stock/mild bolt on mustangs are slow.. thats pretty well know... Its the overwhelming aftermarket world that keep performance people in the mustangs. I defiently didnt buy mine because it was fast.. it looks awesome and I can make it perform the way I want it to. And now when ride in my friends t/a's and camaro's... they feel slow.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mustang gt's??
    By Transamws6 in forum Domestics and Foreigns
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: 01-16-2010, 06:28 AM
  2. 05 Red Mustang GT
    By Z06-Goose in forum Showcar and Detailing
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-30-2009, 09:39 PM
  3. ls1 vs mustang gt
    By midnightnavyz28 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 05:56 PM
  4. here's my mustang...
    By sit_back in forum Member's Rides
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-07-2006, 08:42 PM
  5. 06 Mustang GT vs. 99 z28
    By raybroussard in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-10-2006, 01:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •