07 mustang GT vs 1998 Camaro z28

[silent101]

Aright who would win stock for stock and by how much. I am talking about a dead stop and from a role. Also what do the mustangs get in the 1/4 mile? I seen there HP and torque is around what the LS1 is putting out.

[ss~zoso~ss]

1998 Camaro Z28 would win hands down

[99blueZ]

yes the camaro should win, but auto or stick? A manual GT vs. a '98 auto with 2.73 gears would be a close race

[ss~zoso~ss]

true, not from a roll tho

[Stone]

Best my stepdad had out of his stock 06 5-speed GT was a 13.6@106. F-body should have no trouble

[99blueZ]

Best my stepdad had out of his stock 06 5-speed GT was a 13.6@106. F-body should have no trouble

wow thats one of the best times i've seen for those stock

[silent101]

ya it would be an auto ls1 vs 2007 mustang gt all stock.

[Musclefan21]

i ran bone stock 13.6 with missing a gear.. otherwise it would have been 13.5s or 13.4s stone stock..

i say very very close race!!

[ss~zoso~ss]

lol, missing a gear, you would have been low 13's

[Musclefan21]

lol, missing a gear, you would have been low 13's

this is how happened.. 4-5 cars before the finish line i tried to shift 4th and i missed it and i let the car roll rest if the time.. i didbnt bother trying to grab 4th.. cuz i was 4-5 cars before the finish line..

people at rack told me that i could have been 13.4s..

oh well.. i am happy!!

[Stone]

Track makes a difference though. We supposidly have one of the top ten tracks in the U.S.

[bene]

Best my stepdad had out of his stock 06 5-speed GT was a 13.6@106. F-body should have no trouble

Pretty fast. I saw two 05-06s GT ran 14.2s consistantly w/ both have CAI, and catback. GTs that night and at the same night I ran 13.1s @ 106s

[BlwnCamaro]

I have a 98 Z28 M6, raced several of the local New GT's from roll and dead, results= Blew theirs doors off every time by several car lengths.

[dwhitez28ss]

That's an awesome e.t./mph for a 1997 LT1 Camaro..

i ran bone stock 13.6 with missing a gear.. otherwise it would have been 13.5s or 13.4s stone stock..

i say very very close race!!

[Roastem]

That's an awesome e.t./mph for a 1997 LT1 Camaro..

I think he is talking about his mustang.

[BlwnCamaro]

Track makes a difference though. We supposidly have one of the top ten tracks in the U.S.

Are you referring to No Problem or State Capitol. No Problem is a nice track plus the density altitude is so low there it makes for killer times and there is good traction also.

[4TEHW]

As a Neon driver, I of course think of it in terms of my car. The last generation Mustangs were beatable by a stock SRT-4 (a drivers race for sure). These new ones are able to beat out a stock SRT-4 (stock for stock), but not by a huge amount. I doubt an LS1 will have any issues if it's well driven.

[Stone]

Are you referring to No Problem or State Capitol. No Problem is a nice track plus the density altitude is so low there it makes for killer times and there is good traction also.

No Problem Raceway. State Capital was kinda bad but they are now under new ownership and i hear they have stepped it up a notch.

[chevyvette1]

I saw two 05-06s GT ran 14.2s consistantly w/ both have CAI, and catback.

I agree, a few weeks ago at the track they were mostly running low 14's and a few high 13's, they aren't that fast

[AKIRA]

Hmm, this is the first time ive heard the 06s running these times.. (mid-low 13s)