Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 45

05gt.....vs stock lt1

This is a discussion on 05gt.....vs stock lt1 within the Kill Stories forums, part of the Racing Forums category; dont care what trannies....but stock for stock id like to see this race........

  1. #1
    baconmach
    Guest

    05gt.....vs stock lt1

    dont care what trannies....but stock for stock id like to see this race.....

  2. #2
    Member Capster78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Newport News Va
    Age
    39
    Posts
    578

    Silver
    1998 WS6 M6

    At first I though it was just your age.. But no, you are really retarded.

  3. #3
    baconmach
    Guest
    2 high 13sec rides....yep.....retarded to even think of it????

  4. #4
    Member Capster78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Newport News Va
    Age
    39
    Posts
    578

    Silver
    1998 WS6 M6

    Im prety sure 05 mustangs are mid 13 sec cars even with average drivers.. Some are low 13 sec cars with good drivers.

  5. #5
    Member mogs01gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    37
    Posts
    676
    my money is on the lt1, I cant stand the new stangs and they are over weight pigs.
    324hp/333tq

  6. #6
    SUPREME member-oderator oneBADDz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lost in Texas
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,683

    Custom Slate Blue
    99 B4C

    Right after I sold the '97 M6 (that slightly modded ran pretty much right beside auto LS1s) the guy I sold it to raced one. He was pulling very slightly till he missed third and by the time he got it in gear his front bumper was about at the GTs rear, took all of 3rd and a little 4th to get back beside it. The GT was an auto. I wouldn't count the GTs out, and I for one think they look good too. Stock for stock would definitly be a race to watch
    Last edited by oneBADDz; 01-30-2006 at 07:04 PM.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    US of A
    Age
    39
    Posts
    66
    Yeah I think it would be an interesting race, stock vs stock I'd bet on the 05 GT judging from times and dynos I've seen.

    I've got a bolt-on LT1 (A4 w/ 3.23s, shorty headers, CAI, catback) but I haven't yet had a run in w/ a stockish GT. I'm hoping I can take one as it is now.

  8. #8
    Member mogs01gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    37
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by Camaro Fan
    Yeah I think it would be an interesting race, stock vs stock I'd bet on the 05 GT judging from times and dynos I've seen.

    I've got a bolt-on LT1 (A4 w/ 3.23s, shorty headers, CAI, catback) but I haven't yet had a run in w/ a stockish GT. I'm hoping I can take one as it is now.
    my buddy had the same mods but no headers but pullies. I pulled him by 2 cars in my X piped+ shifter 01 GT. He was a Vert though.

  9. #9
    Senior Member mrr23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    orlando, fl
    Posts
    7,134

    dark bowling green
    2000 corvette

    here in florida, when the 05s finally hit the local track, i was seeing 14.2 -14.4 completely stock. one guy came back with a catback and filter and broke into the 13s. when i had my 94 z28 w/2.73 gears years ago, i hit 13.98 completely stock with consistent 14.0x all night. so, it would be a real close race. would depend on who got the jump first.

  10. #10
    baconmach
    Guest
    my buds got his 97ss near stock...if i see one ill have to try to take one down....i figured id be damn close if not a win the lt1 up top....

    seems like the new 05s are barly quicker if at all then the older 99-04 gt's

    14.1-.2 is what i used to see the near stock 2v's doen

  11. #11
    Member mogs01gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    37
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by baconmach
    my buds got his 97ss near stock...if i see one ill have to try to take one down....i figured id be damn close if not a win the lt1 up top....
    seems like the new 05s are barly quicker if at all then the older 99-04 gt's
    14.1-.2 is what i used to see the near stock 2v's doen
    They arent that quick mainly because of their weight and the fact their ECUs control the throttle from going WOT. A tune does wonders on these cars. Its like they have a blower slapped on them.

  12. #12
    member toneloc60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    currently, a tent in Iraq
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,147

    NBM
    '00 Z28

    I'd like to see that race too. I'm really curious to see if an '05 or newer Ford can take a Chevy that was made for the same market in '93.

  13. #13
    Member mogs01gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    37
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by toneloc60
    I'd like to see that race too. I'm really curious to see if an '05 or newer Ford can take a Chevy that was made for the same market in '93.
    stock for stock? Never seen a stock cambird lt1 run a good time at the track. If it was a 99-04gt, my money would be on the GT.

  14. #14
    Member since 1998 DarthD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Seguin, Texas
    Age
    47
    Posts
    114

    Black ASC#7564 May11,2001
    2001 Trans Am WS6

    It looks like Mustang dynos about 10 hp more to the wheels than a Z28 LT1. I don't have enough info on the SS version of the LT1 but I would guess that it puts down about 10hp more than the Mustang.

    The average LT1 Camaro T56 runs about a 14.29 @ 98.42 mph stock.(0-60 5.77)
    The average LT1 Camaro SS T56 runs about a 13.82 @ 102.99 mph. (0-60 5.47)

    The average '05 Mustang GT T5 runs 13.96 @ 102.37 stock. (0-60 5.36)

    Quote Originally Posted by mogs01gt
    stock for stock? Never seen a stock cambird lt1 run a good time at the track. If it was a 99-04gt, my money would be on the GT.
    The 99-04 gt T5 runs about 14.27 @ 98.83 stock. (5.8 0-60) And puts about 20hp less to the ground than a Z28 LT1.


    Times are taken from the averages of many road tests that I have in a VERY large Excel spreadsheet. Dyno numbers are from a large collection of stock dyno tests that I have in another large Excel spreadsheet.

    I honestly do not have a large enough sample of LT1 dynos yet, but this is probably pretty close. So far, I show the average LT1 T56 dynoing about 253hp to the wheels in 1996.

    Edited to correct name for quoted person. Some people sure get pissed of for the lamest reasons.
    Last edited by DarthD; 02-02-2006 at 03:14 PM.

  15. #15
    Member mogs01gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    37
    Posts
    676
    If you quote me, dont try to be cute and change my name to some lame ass joke.

    The problem with a lot of the lt1 is they are aging and arent well kept. The ones that are and low mileage usually run well.

  16. #16
    SUPREME member-oderator oneBADDz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lost in Texas
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,683

    Custom Slate Blue
    99 B4C

    Me and mogs havn't agreed on anything in any thread yet lol, but JungleJim? damn kids (darth) grow up and play nice

  17. #17
    baconmach
    Guest
    were tryn to put that into perspective...say like my buds 40k 97ss......to be honest though......my last lt1 expeiriance.....120k auto formula ran consistant 14.1s@98 w/ only pully catback and air filter...(373s or 410s would put a hurtn on and 05gts pride....).....and it def had a hard life......id really go good upwards of 120 thats when it startn beatn down the 2v's ....so beat or not if they run haha itll be a good run.....05gt are toilets...if a 100k formula stayed within 2 to 3 cars which id def would.....id be imbarrest to own and 05 gt with over 10 years more technology...

    ford did crazy things in 2003!!! i love em......mach , blown cobra and the lightning....even (though still the same sence 01)...great rides......then they bring out an obease toilet....in 05 that cant beat the 260hp versions that came before them....

    I HATE THE NEW STANGS....AND THE NEW CAMARO LOOKS LIKE A$$ AS WELL...DODGE IS THE ONE THATS COOK'N (UNFORTUNATLY)CHECK THE NEW CHALLENGER OUT!

  18. #18
    Junior Member s197's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oakland, IA
    Posts
    39

    Legend Lime
    2005 Mustang GT

    Quote Originally Posted by baconmach
    id be imbarrest to own and 05 gt with over 10 years more technology...
    I'm sorry, I'm embarrassed for your spelling

  19. #19
    member toneloc60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    currently, a tent in Iraq
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,147

    NBM
    '00 Z28

    Bacon, you and I finally agree.

  20. #20
    Impounded
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    569

    Silver
    02 Camaro Z28

    Quote Originally Posted by Capster78
    Im prety sure 05 mustangs are mid 13 sec cars even with average drivers.. Some are low 13 sec cars with good drivers.
    I've ran a couple 05 GT's and I would say the LT1's I've raced put up a better fight. The 05 sure is better then the last gen 'stangs but no way in hell are they averaging mid 13 second runs...or I'll eat crow. High 13's is what I'm betting you'll see most stock ones run. my 2 cents

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. question 05gt vs 99 TA
    By Justin23454 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 08-24-2007, 06:11 PM
  2. FS: Stock 4-16x8 polished rims w/ stock eagle tires
    By Long Beach in forum Western Members
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2007, 10:15 PM
  3. 05gt vs ls2 gto
    By 2001somws6 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-22-2006, 05:31 PM
  4. 05GT A5 vs 05GT M5
    By s197 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-10-2006, 03:24 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •