Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 46 of 46

What would it take for a 94 z28 to beat a 07 sti?

This is a discussion on What would it take for a 94 z28 to beat a 07 sti? within the LT1 forums, part of the Vehicle Specific category; Originally Posted by Wesman Sure you did. How are you sure he was bone stock?? You can't be, changing the ...

  1. #41
    Senior Member jrc1122's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Abilene, TX
    Posts
    1,053

    Liquid Red
    2009 Pontiac G8 GT

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesman View Post
    Sure you did. How are you sure he was bone stock?? You can't be, changing the ECU programming is not a visial mod

    No Evo runs a 13.4 bogging off the line. Do the math. We're talking about a 235WHP car that weighs 3200lbs, with a less than optimal powerband. If he bogged off the line, or just launched it normally, he'd be running mid high 13's/low 14's. You can't argue with physics. Either you are making shit up, or he was modded.
    You are like that annoying guy back in HS who was almost always wrong, but you could never convience him he was.. It's quite sad really.


    Now back to the topic -- I Saw an Evo run 13.00 and I also saw a 95 LT1 A4 - run a 14.5 same nite.. --
    But what do I know, ,, I was only there.

    PS - I had a friend who had an EVO VIII -- it was an awesome machine. regardless if you a fan or not, you cannot deny it's performance.

  2. #42
    The Bandit Wesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,033

    SGM
    1998 Trans Am WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by 69camarokid View Post
    you say its all because of the all-wheel drive. thats like a 2.0L honda complaining that i have a V8! its retarded, you cant penalize them for having something you don't.
    I'm not penalizing them. I'm saying they are not as fast as they appear to be, based on their accleration numbers.

    Also you say how the acceleration is soooo unimpressive. the cars can do 0-60 in 4.5 to4.8 range....stock! Thats pretty damn impressive! Much faster than a stock LT1 F-body.
    Have you ever driven either car?? Probably not. Notice the massive gap in the acceleration numbers from C&D, 0-60MPH in 4.8 seconds, 5-60MPH in 6.3 seconds. Most cars have a few tenths of a gap between those two tests, the Evo has almost 2 seconds gap. The great times are in the launch, once its off the line the acceleration is very unimpressive.

  3. #43
    The Bandit Wesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,033

    SGM
    1998 Trans Am WS6

    Quote Originally Posted by jrc1122 View Post
    You are like that annoying guy back in HS who was almost always wrong, but you could never convience him he was.. It's quite sad really.
    Now you're just grabbing at straws because you can't have a discussion without getting personal

    Now back to the topic -- I Saw an Evo run 13.00 and I also saw a 95 LT1 A4 - run a 14.5 same nite.. --
    But what do I know, ,, I was only there.
    Don't believe you for one second. Keep making things up.

    PS - I had a friend who had an EVO VIII -- it was an awesome machine. regardless if you a fan or not, you cannot deny it's performance.
    They are not fast cars in stock form. They are dog slow until the turbo spools at 3,000RPM as well. Can't argue with the numbers, its a 230WHP 3300lb car, thats not fast in my book.

  4. #44
    Member camarolvr69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    384

    Silver
    1997 camaro z28




  5. #45
    Senior Member mrr23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    orlando, fl
    Posts
    7,134

    dark bowling green
    2000 corvette

    Quote Originally Posted by camarolvr69 View Post


    done

  6. #46
    Senior Member 5.0THIS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,704

    red
    95 Z28

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesman View Post
    Now you're just grabbing at straws because you can't have a discussion without getting personal



    Don't believe you for one second. Keep making things up.



    They are not fast cars in stock form. They are dog slow until the turbo spools at 3,000RPM as well. Can't argue with the numbers, its a 230WHP 3300lb car, thats not fast in my book.


    Wow, I just cant imagine how you've acquired so many warnings/bans/ etc...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. got beat by a STI
    By 05gtoautoX in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 06-04-2008, 03:46 AM
  2. beat an sti from a dig!!!
    By jAgZ28 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 08:37 PM
  3. what would it take to beat a c6
    By therobman in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-10-2007, 03:34 PM
  4. the suv none of us could beat :P
    By Krazy351w in forum Multimedia Section
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-05-2007, 03:00 PM
  5. got beat by 02 SS
    By Musclefan21 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-09-2006, 01:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •