Results 1 to 9 of 9

New Track times

This is a discussion on New Track times within the LT1 forums, part of the Vehicle Specific category; Hey guys its been a while but im made it back ... got some new numbers for you to look ...

  1. #1
    Pavement Pounder Camaro9teen96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dothan Al
    Age
    32
    Posts
    21

    Black
    1995 Camaro Z28

    New Track times

    Hey guys its been a while but im made it back ... got some new numbers for you to look at.

    R/T : .952 slow? i know lol its been a few months since i made a run
    60FT : 2.068
    330FT: 5.759
    1/8TH: 8.812 @ 80.52

    Quick run down: 1996 LT1 Z28 A4 - SLP Cold air, SLP loudmouth, Throttle body air foil, 1LE Elbow, Underdrive pulleys, TB coolant Bybass, 275/40/17 Sumitomo tires ( not the best in the world but cheap )

    What you guys think? about right or way off?

    I ran this yesterday in Dothan Al and this run was one of a few against a stock 03 Mustang Mach1 that i beat by .0053 on our best run. Not too bad lol

  2. #2
    Senior Member 5.0THIS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,704

    red
    95 Z28

    If you're running with a Mach one, then you're doing fine, assuming the Mach was driven well. The weather can have a big effect on the times, so hard to say there.

  3. #3
    Pavement Pounder Camaro9teen96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dothan Al
    Age
    32
    Posts
    21

    Black
    1995 Camaro Z28

    weather was id say mid 60's clear skies not a bad day i wouldnt think.

  4. #4
    baconmach
    Guest
    not bad ....thats about....13.5-.6

  5. #5
    Looking for new Fbody
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Age
    38
    Posts
    74
    sounds about right on...although I NEVER got a sub 2.1 60' in the 94 I had...even after heads/cam. I must be a sucky driver

  6. #6
    Pavement Pounder Camaro9teen96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dothan Al
    Age
    32
    Posts
    21

    Black
    1995 Camaro Z28

    60'

    i usually run around a 2.0XX i think only once did i dip below 2.0 and even then it was a 1.9XX. im not sure how lol other than i dont spin very much off the line. maybe the tires i have are better than i thought but i wouldnt think they would be very great at $400 for the set mounted and balanced.
    the tires that are on there now are Sumitomo HTR+ 275/40/zr17. like i said cheap but apparently effective. im wanting to run nitto555's anyone have any luck with those? if not what would be a really good street strip tire? im gonna be on the market soon lol. anyways. thanks for the replies. later
    1996 Camaro Z28 A4 260 WRHP / 285 WRTQ
    8.65 @ 83 1/8th Mile <--- best run so far
    Power adders : SLP Loudmouth Catback, SLP C.A.I., TB Bypass, TB Airfoil, 1LE Elbow. Soon Hypertech!!
    Non-Power adders: Strut Brace, RK Sport Fan Switch

  7. #7
    HUNTER S. THOMPSON FAN Raoul-Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    BURBANK
    Posts
    1,120
    Yeah I Would Also Say 13.5 Dependin On The Traction Issues If There Are Any

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Camaro9teen96
    Hey guys its been a while but im made it back ... got some new numbers for you to look at.

    R/T : .952 slow? i know lol its been a few months since i made a run
    60FT : 2.068
    330FT: 5.759
    1/8TH: 8.812 @ 80.52

    Quick run down: 1996 LT1 Z28 A4 - SLP Cold air, SLP loudmouth, Throttle body air foil, 1LE Elbow, Underdrive pulleys, TB coolant Bybass, 275/40/17 Sumitomo tires ( not the best in the world but cheap )

    What you guys think? about right or way off?

    I ran this yesterday in Dothan Al and this run was one of a few against a stock 03 Mustang Mach1 that i beat by .0053 on our best run. Not too bad lol
    Looks more like a 13.6-13.8@101. Not bad

    A well driven mach can be a hand full. I have a friend who has one and he runs 13.3@104 bone stock. Well driven of course.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by MIDNITELT1Z
    Yeah I Would Also Say 13.5 Dependin On The Traction Issues If There Are Any

    a 2.0 60, Not to much of an issue. Sounds like he managed pretty well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. bad times at the track
    By shady milkman in forum General Help
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 08:38 PM
  2. New track times
    By dpinson in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-27-2010, 09:14 PM
  3. The best of bad track times???
    By GNICTRY in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-07-2007, 03:08 AM
  4. 99 1le track times
    By fraz1le in forum Drag Racing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2007, 10:45 PM
  5. Track Times??
    By The Rookie in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-25-2006, 06:19 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •