Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 44 of 44

V6 Burnout?

This is a discussion on V6 Burnout? within the Firebird / WS6 forums, part of the Vehicle Specific category; I use to have a red 95 3.4l v6 maro a4 with alot of miles and i was always running ...

  1. #41
    Junior Member BADHAWK209's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010

    00 TRANS AM M6

    I use to have a red 95 3.4l v6 maro a4 with alot of miles and i was always running it hard,i did donuts easy even with 20's and a box in the back,I put a posi rear end on it from a 94 z28 and it swung even better.I sold it 2 years back it was just too slow for me

  2. #42
    Hide ya kids Hide ya wife 94ss06gxp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Shepherd MI

    Silver, Stealth Gray
    97 SS CLONE, 06 GP GXP

    Quote Originally Posted by Smittro View Post
    Yeah we can do a burn out (2 legs too)..hehehe

    sounds just like my weedwacker

  3. #43
    Senior Member Too Fast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    2000 WS6 6spd Hooker LT

    Quote Originally Posted by Smittro View Post
    Or you can always trade it in on one of these...
    Poor Mustang, what a smackdown!

    And there has never been a 6 cylinder OE Formula.

  4. #44
    ʢ ൧ ൨ ൩ ൪ ൫ ൬ ൭ ൮Ր Ց Ւ Փ Smittro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009

    2008 Hummer H3

    The 3.4 was the nail in the coffin so to speak.. GM in their infinite wisdom desided to run an all iron ~150hp in F-body when many folks were used to running 3.4 high features in thier family cars.. Needless to say the puller cars had more stuff a 3.4 grand-am high feature will eat an all iron 3.4 for breakfast to~110 mph.. The f-body 3.4 was a horrible joke played on us 660 guys/gals.. SHitty heads, shitty UI, shitty LI, Expanded 2 piece POS flex plates (auto), castrated the sweet spot & 6000 rpm for a lousy 6200 limiter. Suddenly the 3800 was looking better and better.. But Alas we gat the all iron 3800II, and shortly after you v8 guys got the ls1.. You guys with the ls1 made out,, the v6 crowd was hung out to dry.. GM has been making better more powerfull v6 forever.. Notice now how GM went back to the 660 and gave it on par ls1 type power out of an N/A 660 3.6l.. A high feature no less too.. GM could have been offering 300+ hp in many v6 platforms but did'nt for whatever reason...
    Last edited by Smittro; 10-16-2010 at 04:31 AM.

    Suggestion: If you are particularly irritated by another member's posting habits and are constantly fighting the urge to flame them, you can click on that person's profile, and select "Add to ignore list." This will make that person's posts invisible to you.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Help: Can't do a burnout!!!!!
    By Maro_Man in forum Camaro / SS
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-31-2010, 06:56 PM
  2. Question: How long of a burnout for my new M.T.'s??
    By Rich L in forum Drag Racing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 07:22 PM
  3. rediculus burnout
    By 02fbody35th in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-09-2008, 07:40 AM
  4. Longest Burnout Ever
    By burnws6 in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 05-07-2007, 11:06 AM
  5. wife's car vs 20 psi eclipse
    By mrr23 in forum Kill Stories
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-22-2006, 11:22 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts