Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 62
  1. #1
    Member jd1666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TX cedar park
    Posts
    635

    arctic white
    97 firebird

    v6 97 firebird or 94 5.0 5 speed gt stang

    which should i do, i want better performance and i no the stang will and can get alot more parts in it and twin turbos. im not sure if it will be worth it or just stick with new exhaust, cold air intake, reprogram and slap a twins on the v6 what do you guys think

  2. #2
    NY Representative basballny2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    NeW YoRk
    Posts
    3,394

    Red
    2001 ws6

    id say go with the stang

  3. #3
    Senior Member Sleeper101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Springcity
    Posts
    1,152

    Red
    Vette,240sx,ls1 camaro

    Sell them both and get a Honda!!! Gas is getting too expensive. Unless your building a track car!! Then I say Gut your trans am and build a mean twin turbo setup on a small block. Unless you have money Lots of money the v6 is just not worth it.

  4. #4
    Sarge for AAG Emperor hutch1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    3,777

    06 HD Softail
    1998 Trans Am m6

    are you thinking about buying a 94 GT? if so I wouldnt buy the stang id buy an lt1.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Newport, RI
    Posts
    1,552

    Navy Blue Metallic
    '00 Formy A4

    Quote Originally Posted by hutch1999 View Post
    are you thinking about buying a 94 GT? if so I wouldnt buy the stang id buy an lt1.
    Ditto.

    A nice LT1 should be about the same price as the Stang.

    If I was going to buy a 5.0 Ford, I'd go with a LX Notchback.

    But if it's stang vs. V6 Bird, go with the Stang.

    Stang will be faster for cheaper.

  6. #6
    LS1 chosen son lemons12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    tennessee
    Posts
    2,010

    TA-White, Camaro-Black
    Track-TA98A4 DD-98z28M6

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    which should i do, i want better performance and i no the stang will and can get alot more parts in it and twin turbos. im not sure if it will be worth it or just stick with new exhaust, cold air intake, reprogram and slap a twins on the v6 what do you guys think
    id also go with an lt1 camaro first..... but out of the two... if it is a nice gt.. id go with it.... will be a little bit faster, especially after modding.. and will sound 10x's better.

  7. #7
    Member jd1666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TX cedar park
    Posts
    635

    arctic white
    97 firebird

    how much hp does lt 1 have?

  8. #8
    let the F-Bodies roll jimmybling31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    hixson tennessee
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,641

    white
    94 camaro z28

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    how much hp does lt 1 have?
    94 has 275hp. it's easy to make more too. really easy

  9. #9
    Member jd1666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TX cedar park
    Posts
    635

    arctic white
    97 firebird

    wouldnt a gt be quicker it has like 305 hp stock plus quite a bit modifications

    a 94 5.0 5 speed of coarse though

  10. #10
    let the F-Bodies roll jimmybling31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    hixson tennessee
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,641

    white
    94 camaro z28

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    wouldnt a gt be quicker it has like 305 hp stock plus quite a bit modifications

    a 94 5.0 5 speed of coarse though
    a 94 gt does not have 305hp. nowhere near that. i was able to beat bolt on ones when I was stock. lt1's are quick

  11. #11
    rapter34
    Guest
    what??? a stock 94 mustang GT has 215 hp woth 288 ft lbs. not to mention more drivetrail loss than a LT1. the LT1 stock in 94 had 275 HP with 325 ft lbs. not even a close race.

  12. #12
    Member jd1666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TX cedar park
    Posts
    635

    arctic white
    97 firebird

    really, what is the stock hp for the 94 gt then? ive been told alot of different answers

  13. #13
    rapter34
    Guest
    a stock GT has 215 HP factory rated and certified.

  14. #14
    let the F-Bodies roll jimmybling31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    hixson tennessee
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,641

    white
    94 camaro z28

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    really, what is the stock hp for the 94 gt then? ive been told alot of different answers
    215 with a 15 sec quarter mile. it's slow. here is the specs. it's slow. really slow for a sports car likke that. the lt1 just walks on it. completely

    http://www.maximum-cars.com/Cars/Car.php?carnumber=473

  15. #15
    Member jd1666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TX cedar park
    Posts
    635

    arctic white
    97 firebird

    damn i didnt no that, how much are lt-1's running for? for a stock im looking to dump alot of money into it or should i just save a couple of months and get a z28 standard

  16. #16
    rapter34
    Guest
    ohh if your close to getting an LS1 save up and get it you will not be disipointed.

  17. #17
    LS1 chosen son lemons12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    tennessee
    Posts
    2,010

    TA-White, Camaro-Black
    Track-TA98A4 DD-98z28M6

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    how much hp does lt 1 have?
    already answered.. they are tq. in low rpms...

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmybling31 View Post
    94 has 275hp. it's easy to make more too. really easy
    easy??? you do the same things you do to all other cars...

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    wouldnt a gt be quicker it has like 305 hp stock plus quite a bit modifications

    a 94 5.0 5 speed of coarse though
    the new 05 and up dont even have 305.. muhahahahahaha the new ones JUST managed to surpass the 1993 lt1s in HP.. and they are still slower..

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmybling31 View Post
    a 94 gt does not have 305hp. nowhere near that. i was able to beat bolt on ones when I was stock. lt1's are quick

    i want you to race me... you never really agreed in the other thread....

  18. #18
    let the F-Bodies roll jimmybling31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    hixson tennessee
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,641

    white
    94 camaro z28

    Quote Originally Posted by lemons12 View Post
    already answered.. they are tq. in low rpms...



    easy??? you do the same things you do to all other cars...



    the new 05 and up dont even have 305.. muhahahahahaha the new ones JUST managed to surpass the 1993 lt1s in HP.. and they are still slower..




    i want you to race me... you never really agreed in the other thread....
    it's easy because the motor is much more like a 1st gen chevy motor and for me that makes it easier to work on. I have built a couple of 1st gen chevy motors. my 92 z28, my old boat's motor, and my uncle's 82 truck. to me being alot more like a 1st gen motor makes it easier to make power. you do the same things, but it's easier to work on for someone who has worked with 1st gen motors, and it's cheaper to get parts for. I don't even know what you have done to your car. no reason not to have a fun run at the drag strip. lol.

  19. #19
    let the F-Bodies roll jimmybling31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    hixson tennessee
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,641

    white
    94 camaro z28

    Quote Originally Posted by jd1666 View Post
    damn i didnt no that, how much are lt-1's running for? for a stock im looking to dump alot of money into it or should i just save a couple of months and get a z28 standard
    if you got the money go with an ls1. you will enjoy it alot more initially and they look 10times better.

  20. #20
    LS1 chosen son lemons12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    tennessee
    Posts
    2,010

    TA-White, Camaro-Black
    Track-TA98A4 DD-98z28M6

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmybling31 View Post
    it's easy because the motor is much more like a 1st gen chevy motor and for me that makes it easier to work on. I have built a couple of 1st gen chevy motors. my 92 z28, my old boat's motor, and my uncle's 82 truck. to me being alot more like a 1st gen motor makes it easier to make power. you do the same things, but it's easier to work on for someone who has worked with 1st gen motors, and it's cheaper to get parts for. I don't even know what you have done to your car. no reason not to have a fun run at the drag strip. lol.
    blah... not at the strip.. you guys are in CHATT. area.. me and 7cam7 were gonna meet up to.. i want to pick on some ricers while im there... street..

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 1994 firebird 3.4 5-speed
    By silver98camss in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-06-2009, 07:13 AM
  2. 1994 Firebird V6 5-Speed $1,800
    By silver98camss in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-16-2008, 03:59 AM
  3. 99 Firebird 58k 6 speed ...hit in front...
    By Frans96ss in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-11-2006, 05:47 PM
  4. 2002 Firebird Formula 6-speed
    By 2002fb in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-22-2006, 06:14 AM
  5. Pontiac Firebird 2002 Trans Am WS6 Ram Air - 6 Speed
    By JustinP325 in forum Vehicles For Sale / Trade
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-30-2006, 04:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •