Results 1 to 2 of 2

Installing A Mass-Flo EFI System - New-Age SD-455

This is a discussion on Installing A Mass-Flo EFI System - New-Age SD-455 within the Firebird / WS6 forums, part of the Vehicle Specific category; Installing A Mass-Flo EFI System - New-Age SD-455 According to Webster's dictionary, the word "test," used as a noun, is ...

  1. #1
    Blown, Stroked, & Sprayed

    Ed Blown Vert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    San Diego, Ca

    383 Procharged & N20 Vert

    Exclamation Installing A Mass-Flo EFI System - New-Age SD-455

    Installing A Mass-Flo EFI System - New-Age SD-455
    According to Webster's dictionary, the word "test," used as a noun, is an examination or evaluation of something or someone. By the same authority, a "contest" is a competition or a challenge. When two cars race down a dragstrip, it's a competition. If the same two vehicles are subjected to examination of individual performance categories, such as fuel mileage, idle quality, power, and handling, it is then a test.
    What separates this test of a Demon carburetor and Mass-Flo's EFI system from others is that the results are derived with the same fuel and on the same day. Both HPP and RaceKrafters Automotive Machine in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, went to extreme lengths to execute this protocol so the results would be 100 percent valid and have meaning. If we had taken the easy way out, we would not have had to spend as many long days nor had to drive as many miles as we did, but the data would have been suspect.
    Most of the time, HPP generates its own technical article subject matter, but we are always open to suggestions and embrace a good topic, no matter where it comes from. This is how this series came about. Chris Richards, Mass-Flo EFI's proprietor, contacted HPP because he was designing a fuel injection system for the traditional Pontiac engine and wanted to know if the magazine would be interested in examining a prototype. The editor liked the idea but also wanted chassis dyno testing performed on the EFI induction system and the carbureted one that would be replaced.
    Happenstance modified the original plan when the SD-455 T/A test car, owned by HPP contributor Melvin Benzaquen, developed a rod knock on Bob Ida's chassis dyno. As a technical writer, the author believes this misfortune was actually responsible for a more accurate test since the same intake manifold would be used for both fuel delivery methods.
    The original test was conceived as a comparison of the complete induction systems, including their respective intake manifolds. Since the SD engine possesses one of Pontiac's best stock induction systems with its 800 cfm Q-jet carb and factory-designed highly efficient dual-plane intake manifold, and because many who would upgrade to EFI would be coming from a similar 750 cfm Q-jet/dual-plane intake combo, the editor felt that using the rebuilt SD engine and its stock 800 cfm Q-jet against the new Mass-Flo system would result in a valid test. This comparison would have also revealed how differences in the manifold designs-Edelbrock single-plane Torker II vs. the SD's dual-plane intake-affect the power curve
    Then the engine expired on the dyno during initial baseline testing. Turning lemons into lemonade, the SD-455 was rebuilt at RaceKrafters (Part I Jan. '07 HPP, Part II Feb. '07) and it was upgraded with head port work and a Comp Cams hydraulic roller cam. The stock valley pan didn't fit with roller lifters so an aftermarket valley pan was installed, which in turn didn't fit with the stock 1974 intake. As a result, the decision was made to simply use the Edelbrock Torker II intake that was part of the EFI system to test both the EFI and the carburetor. Well, the spread-bore flange Q-jet doesn't fit on the square-flange intake without an adapter, which would skew the results, so a Demon 750 square-flange carb replaced the Q-jet as our test carburetor. See how easy this stuff is? We now had an EFI vs. carburetor test that eliminated the intake as a variable.
    Though many readers viewed the engine dyno test in Part III (April '07 HPP) as a competition-much like a boxing match-by definition of a test, there is no winner or loser, just hard data. We clearly and accurately stated the test results and went to great lengths to explain with sound engineering, why the carburetor performed better than the EFI. This was not done to discredit the EFI system, but to state indisputable facts.
    The Mass-Flo EFI is a great system that ran very well and was within three percent of the power produced by the Demon carburetor in that test. Likewise, Barry Grant did an excellent job designing the Speed Demon carburetor and should be applauded for its performance. If you want an EFI traditional Pontiac, the Mass-Flo EFI system is an excellent candidate. However, if your desire is to have the most efficient running Pontiac with minimal cost and complexity, your ticket is the Demon carburetor. We never intended to convert an EFI fan to carburetors or vice versa, just to present the facts and data of our testing.
    A chassis dyno test was always in our plan but was modified slightly, out of respect to a request by Mass-Flo. The company believed the Ford EEC-IV ECU needed to be driven a few hundred miles to produce the best results. Chris felt the engine management's adaptive learning would have enough authority to minimize the power differential between the two fuel delivery methods that was documented on the engine dyno. Thus, Melvin drove the Trans Am 500 miles before final chassis dyno testing. He told HPP, "The throttle response is great on the street with the EFI. You get on it and it goes, without any hesitation. Of course, the increased power of the engine rebuild helps a great deal, but the EFI does operate as hoped for. Hot starts are no problem. It is smooth and tractable, and fuel mileage is currently 16 mpg, which isn't bad with a Turbo 400, 3.08 gears, A/C, a 4,000+ pound curb weight, over 500 hp at the flywheel, and a heavy foot." (The Demon carb was not tested on the street.)
    RaceKrafters' engine dyno cell is equipped with a high level of data collection and we were able to confirm with confidence that both fuel systems were performing at 100 percent. Though the author didn't agree with Mass-Flo's adaptive learning premise, it was decided by all that putting a few hundred miles on the SD T/A before final chassis dyno testing would not hurt. If it did help and the author was wrong, so be it. The reason for this exercise was to provide our readers with accurate and unbiased data. In engineering, there is no room for an ego. The laws of physics prevail every time.
    To see what it took to install Mass-Flo's prototype EFI in the SD T/A, follow along with the photos and captions. After Classic Restorations completed the installation, it was back to RaceKrafters chassis dyno to test the SD with the EFI and carburetor in a unique back-to-back comparison. The results are presented in this final installment.
    The Shaker Fix
    Since the T/A is Shaker equipped, more mods were needed to properly place the hood scoop with the EFI system. The scoop was 3/4-inch too far forward due to the Torker II's mounting flange positioning relative to the stock intake, and 3/8-inch too high because the adapter ring between the throttle body and MAF, on which the air cleaner base sits, was slightly too tall. Keep in mind that you won't need to do any of the following mods on a non-shaker Pontiac.
    SD-455 ENGINE SPECSEngine Displacement 463 ci
    BOTTOM ENDBlock 1974 SD-455Deck Height 10.210-inCrankshaft SD-455, 4.210-strokeRods Eagle H-beam, forged steel, stock lengthPistons SRP 4.185-in forged flat-top with valve reliefsCompression Height 1.480-inPiston-to-Deck Height ZeroRings Perfect CircleRod Bolts ARP
    OILING SYSTEMOil Pan Stock Oil Pump Melling high volume
    HEADSCasting Number #16 Round-Port SD, portedCombustion Chamber Volume 98ccsCompression Ratio 9.49:1Valves, Intake Ferrea ss 2.11-inValves, Exhaust Manley ss 1.77-inAngles used in valve job Intake 30-45-60-75-82-deg 30-45-60-75-82-degExhaust 30-45-55-82-degHead Bolts ARPRocker Arms Comp Cams roller, 1.65:1Pushrods Comp Cams, High Tech, 5/16-in dia., 8.650-in long
    CAMBrand Comp Cams hyd. roller, 224/230-deg dur. at.050, .552/.561-in lift, 110-deg LSAInstalled Position 105.5-degLifters Comp rollerValve Springs Comp Cams, dualSeat Pressure 121 lbsOpen Pressure 328 lbsTiming Chain Double roller
    INDUCTIONCarb Barry Grant 750 DemonEFI Mass-Flo MAF and 1,000 cfm throttle bodyIntake Manifold Edelbrock Torker II single-plane
    IGNITIONDistributor For EFI Mallory from Mass-FloDistributor For Carb MSD Pro Billet
    EXHAUSTHooker Super Comp 1.875-inch headersCollectors 3.5-inches

    Photo Gallery: Installing A Mass-Flo EFI System - High Performance Pontiac Magazine

    Read More | Digg It | Add to


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Beaver Dam KY

    79 T/A -91 Firebird
    1998 Trans Am -Oynx Black

    Its sad that our 455 sd is no longer in my dad 74 TAsinceflipped 5 times end over end. still have the long block tho!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. All About A/C
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything Goes
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-11-2007, 09:40 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2007, 06:50 AM
  3. Pontiac Trans Am 455 Optional Packages - Got Torque?
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum Firebird / WS6
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2007, 06:50 AM
  4. code for posi?
    By comegetusome in forum General Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-13-2006, 03:11 PM
  5. Where To Get The Decoder For Door Jam Id Tag
    By inneedofls1 in forum General Help
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 08:14 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts