Results 1 to 4 of 4
new camaro numbers
This is a discussion on new camaro numbers within the Camaro / SS forums, part of the Vehicle Specific category; ...
09-29-2008, 05:39 PM #1
new camaro numbers
hey guys i donno if this has been posted already but i just found this on the net ans was pretty impressed. found it on edmunds.com
NORTH HOLLYWOOD, California — GM engineers at today's official 2010 Chevrolet Camaro unveil were all too willing to provide performance numbers for their hot, new muscle car, including quarter-mile and 0-60-mph times.
Al Oppenheiser, chief engineer for GM's North American rear-wheel-drive platform and owner of a first-generation Camaro convertible, was pleased to run through his baby's accomplishments.
According to Oppenheiser, the new 300-horsepower 3.6-liter V6-equipped Camaro will run from zero to 60 mph in 6.1 seconds regardless of transmission choice. The V6 coupe will cover the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds with an auto and 14.7 seconds with a manual, both at 97 mph. The brakes don't sound quite as impressive, though, as Oppenheiser said the base Camaro stops from 60 to zero mph in 132 feet.
Not surprisingly, the V8-equipped Camaro SS delivers better numbers across the board. Chevy's Camaro SS outfitted with the 422-hp 6.2-liter LS3 V8 six-speed manual hits 60 mph in 4.9 seconds and runs a 13.4-second quarter-mile at 108 mph according to Oppenheiser. Strangely enough, Oppenheiser also claims that the automatic-equipped SS Camaro, which is rated at 400 hp, runs from zero to 60 mph in just 4.6 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds. "We optimized the shift points," he said.
Both versions of the V8 Camaro SS pull a maximum 0.90 g on the skid pad. Four-piston Brembo brakes help stop the Camaro SS in 117 feet.
What this means to you: If Chevrolet's numbers pan out, the Camaro SS will be every bit as fast as the Dodge Challenger SRT8 for a lot less money. — Kelly Toepke, News Editor
09-29-2008, 05:43 PM #2
Edmund.com again...stating Camaro will be cheaper by "a lot less" than the challenger.
09-29-2008, 05:45 PM #3
well if the numbers are right i think thats pretty good for a 3900lb car
Last edited by imprtkillr2810; 09-29-2008 at 05:48 PM.
09-29-2008, 05:54 PM #4
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 0Last Post: 05-30-2008, 08:50 PM
By zbizkit in forum Multimedia SectionReplies: 19Last Post: 01-12-2007, 11:52 AM
By Marc1130 in forum Parts For Sale / TradeReplies: 2Last Post: 08-25-2006, 01:25 AM
By SS#1531 in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 62Last Post: 01-16-2006, 05:54 AM