Want to turbo or S/C 383 stroker
This is a discussion on Want to turbo or S/C 383 stroker within the Forced Induction forums, part of the LSx Technical Help Section category; My wife just gave me the OK to get either a SC or turbo. Now, the fun is deciding which ...
03-03-2008, 04:43 PM #1
Want to turbo or S/C 383 stroker
My wife just gave me the OK to get either a SC or turbo. Now, the fun is deciding which one, but I have a problem. I was talking to a guy at work who told me that if you get too small a turbo, then you wouldn't really gain that much.
One turbo system I saw had a T4 (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/97-02...em250220213167) and said it would produce around 530 rwhp.
I'm pushing around 430 rwhp and tq right now with bad valve springs...921s will be here this week. He said that the 530 is pretty much all I would get. I was hoping after springs I would be at 460 or more, then with a SC or turbo, maybe 550 or more. He asid the turbo was too small for my set up though.
Can someone PLEASE steer me in the right direction? My sig is below (red top 36# injectors not listed as well as a couple other little things). Motor barely has 2000 miles on it now.
Thanks in advance for the help4" Stroker Crank/4340 H Beam Rods/Forged Pistons/File to fit Plasma Moly Rings/Patriot S2 LS6 heads/Harland Sharp rockers/SLP Lid/Smooth Bellowes/Comp 232/234 595/598 112 lsa/chrome-moly push rods/LS1 Edit/LS6 intake/Spec3 clutch/Fidenza aluminum flywheel/4.10s/MAC mid-lengths/MAC ORY/SLP catback
03-03-2008, 05:11 PM #2
the supercharger is an easier install and your exhaust would stay intact I do prefer a turbo but they are more complex and the rear mount systems arent as good as front mount just my opinion so do lots of research
03-03-2008, 05:41 PM #3
Is there any relationship to the current horsepower to what size s/c or turbo you must run? In ither words, if a s/c was rated to 500 rwhp and I was already making 480 or something, would 500 pretty much be my limit?
My initial uneducated thought was that if a s/c or turbo could make 450 rwhp on a stock engine, then a s/c or turbi on my set up would make exponentially more power.
Any truth or myth to this?
03-03-2008, 05:52 PM #4
I don't know all the mathematical stuff but both a centrifical supercharger and a turbo are basically a remote compressor and when it says 500 hp that is just a ballpark estimate but the compressor will only push x amount of air then thats it my turbo is a gt45 master power 76mm and its limit is 800hp while a 88 mm would be like 1200hp its really all so vauge there is no other way than testing to know what will work best
03-03-2008, 05:56 PM #5
I say looka t the ATI D1sc, a supercharger is an easier intro to FI than turbo, and once setup properly will last a very long time and be very reliable. With all of your mods, a little boost will go a long way. I would say with the compression you are running a meth kit will be a must too, and 60lb injectors. At only 7psi you should make 550rwhp with your mods and possibly as much as 580 depending on how aggressive you are on the meth and timing. This is close to the upper limit of a single Walbro in-tank pump and harness and meth system combined as well.
03-03-2008, 06:13 PM #6
Is the meth kit a must because of possible detonation with higher compression? I was hoping to run pump gas, but doesn't sound like that's going to happen...I've never ran anything less than 93 octane since I owned the car.
I'm hoping to find a a used D1sc...much cheaper to rebuild than buy new, so I've heard anyways.
Thanks for all advice!
03-03-2008, 07:39 PM #7
03-04-2008, 02:02 AM #8
You'll be able to run 93 and the methanol with no problem. I run a 60-40 mix and it's just fine. At full boost I only see inlet air temps of 94 degrees. I bought the snow performance kit. Works fine and I just plumbed it into my windshield washer tank. That way I have a built in indicator when it's getting low.
03-04-2008, 09:57 AM #9
Thanks for all the advice.
Is my bottom end considered stock though? Eagle steel stroker crank, 4340 eagle h-beam rods, mahle forged flat tops, etc...basically, a eagle 383 stroker kit on a 2006 LSX block.
Just wondering...again, thanks for the advice and information!
03-04-2008, 12:03 PM #10
You have a long-stroke crank in an LSX block? Thought the 383 crank was the same crank used in a 40X" setup.... how many cubes do you have? That LSX block is serious bidness, which heads did you use, the ETPs or the ALL PROs?
03-04-2008, 12:04 PM #11
03-04-2008, 12:42 PM #12
From what I know, yes, this changes the CID from 347 to 383 since CID is just bore X stroke and with the longer throw crank, the stroke was changed which changed the CID calculation...old school 400 crank in a 350=383.
03-04-2008, 04:28 PM #13
03-04-2008, 08:54 PM #14
Right, here's the confusion; "the" LSX block is a 6-bolt/cyl big-inch block from GM that was not something that has ever been in a production vehicle. You are talking about a Ls1/Ls6 block.
That's still some healthy compression and even with the meth, timing needs to be looked at on the street if the car is tuned on a dynojet without load control or similar.
03-05-2008, 04:38 AM #15
Ohhhh...I read somehwere that when the block was not made by GM (aftermarket) and late model requiring the shorter head bolts, it was called an LSX block. Sorry for the confusion, but yes then, it's an LS6 stroked to a 383. I think they said I'd be in the vicenity of 10.5:1 on CR.
Thanks for the help!
03-11-2008, 07:20 PM #16
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
I have a 383ci LS1 with a forged bottem end and a Vortech T trim at 10 psi. with an aftercooler. I have heavily ported stock heads and a blower cam. I am waiting on my 60 lb injectors to come in and then I will get it tuned and give you the hp numbers. It will be pretty close to your setup. You better go ahead and order some 60lb injectors for whichever blower you put on it.
Last edited by ExStanger; 03-11-2008 at 07:38 PM.
03-17-2008, 04:24 PM #17
So whats up guys, how come there is no love for the remote mount systems??A TYPICAL DAY AT WORK!!!!
03-17-2008, 06:11 PM #18
03-17-2008, 06:23 PM #19
That is true, but STS has solved all of those problems.
03-17-2008, 06:48 PM #20
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By 99Ls1fever in forum Internal EngineReplies: 21Last Post: 02-15-2008, 10:40 PM
By Ed Blown Vert in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 0Last Post: 10-18-2007, 10:50 PM
By Ed Blown Vert in forum GTOReplies: 0Last Post: 09-29-2007, 06:50 AM
By QKRDTA3 in forum Vehicles For Sale / TradeReplies: 2Last Post: 02-27-2006, 12:56 PM
By GMaugie45 in forum Internal EngineReplies: 3Last Post: 09-14-2005, 09:46 PM