Results 1 to 20 of 34
Thread: superchargers in mind.
-
04-07-2010, 08:30 AM #1
superchargers in mind.
thinking about picking one of these up, my friend recommends the procharger but i want something different and i was leaning on the mti superchager, let me know what you recommend thanks.
http://mtiracing.com/camaro-supercharger.html
http://www.procharger.com/LSxTransplant.shtml
http://www.rmcrperformance.com/fbody
-
04-08-2010, 03:24 PM #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Milwaukee
- Posts
- 75
SOM- 2001 SOM WS6 408
MTI is a roots style blower. 2 issues. First is heat soak and second is having to hack up the underside of your hood depending on what kind of car you have. They do make a ton of torque down low compared to a centrif. blower. I personally would love to have one if it would fit better under my WS6 hood and they had more top end power.
2001 WS6 SOM 6 speed procharged forged 347
2000 Camaro SS #1097, 425rwhp SOLD
2001 Thundercat 1108
-
04-10-2010, 06:22 PM #3
Dragon Race Engineering http://www.dragonrace.com/ now makes a 3.3 Whipple that fits under the cowl without a customor dropped K-member. Personally, I love the sound of these things but the Procharger is way more dependable are more upgradeable.
-
04-19-2010, 11:35 AM #4
Procharger
-
04-19-2010, 11:40 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Shepherd, Michigan
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 11,770
blacker than wesleysnipes- 98' trans am
i say procharger
-
04-19-2010, 01:39 PM #6
I would go with a roots no doubt. After driving a Termi and seeing a roots performs, ESPECIALLY down low, I wouldn't go with anything else. I didn't know about the 3.3 whipple, but thats what I'ma go with now for SURE. The MP112 is just a little to small to be honest, which was the only thing keeping me from going with it.
-
04-19-2010, 02:50 PM #7
Curious why it would be more dependable.
I would have thought that the front-mounted blowers, with all the bracketry, and with or without intercooler plumbing, and associated oil lines or failures caused by isolated and non-isolated oil supplies, just represent more challenges.
The roots style with it's centralized mountings etc., just seem like less engineering is necessary to make it reliable -more elegant.
If you are speaking from experience -please explain.
-
04-19-2010, 09:31 PM #8
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Sunniest city on Earth
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 612
- 2011 Silverado CC 4x4 6.2
Roots requires cutting the cowl or K-member spacers (or both) to fit on a 4th-gen f-body. If there really is a 3.3 Whipple that will clear the cowl, that would be really sweet and different, but the centrifugal superchargers (Procharger, Vortech, Paxton Novi) are the way to go for the easiest installation and the least amount of custom work.
-
04-21-2010, 06:38 AM #9
There is indeed a company out their that doesn't require cutting the cowl, just moving the K-member and putting it back....no spacers. You do have to pin the crank but I think Procharger requires that too.
-
04-21-2010, 09:09 PM #10
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Sunniest city on Earth
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 612
- 2011 Silverado CC 4x4 6.2
That sounds like an incredibly good excuse to throw on a tubular K-member while your at it if you find any more info on that, be sure to post it up
-
04-22-2010, 08:53 AM #11
-
04-22-2010, 09:01 AM #12
-
04-23-2010, 01:16 AM #13
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Sunniest city on Earth
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 612
- 2011 Silverado CC 4x4 6.2
And they should theoretically be stronger. In addition, some K-members provide more clearance for other mods
-
04-23-2010, 07:00 AM #14
im on the whipple side at the moment do u think they have to go through the firewall in they install that supercharger?
-
04-24-2010, 06:27 AM #15
it's the charger from Dragon that came out recently. They claim 250hp increase, but it's not cheap. I've been flipping between Procharger and Vortech, now this to consider.
-
04-24-2010, 06:56 AM #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- Surf City, NC
- Posts
- 2,499
Black/Screaming Yellow- 99 S/C TA WS6 & 04 Cobra
IMO Procharger kit is way easier than the Vortech kit.
-
04-24-2010, 08:14 AM #17
I was sold on the Procharger, but now with the V-3 self contained head unit = no tapping of the oil pan and it's interchangeable with the high mount G trim. Plus I can still utilize my ram air hood.
-
04-24-2010, 03:49 PM #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Sunniest city on Earth
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 612
- 2011 Silverado CC 4x4 6.2
-
04-26-2010, 07:29 AM #19
-
04-26-2010, 04:54 PM #20
Here is the 4th gen page at Dragon
http://www.dragonrace.com/dssmain.htm#gen4fbodypics
if link needs to go bye bye I understand not wanting to step on toes
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
superchargers?
By devon in forum Forced InductionReplies: 8Last Post: 06-08-2011, 01:41 PM -
Superchargers
By t-topsonline in forum Camaro / SSReplies: 8Last Post: 03-19-2009, 12:24 PM -
Superchargers
By t-topsonline in forum Firebird / WS6Replies: 3Last Post: 03-18-2009, 02:21 PM -
How hard are Superchargers on an LS1
By Combat_Chuck in forum Forced InductionReplies: 7Last Post: 02-12-2009, 04:24 PM -
Superchargers Or Turbo For 99 T/a
By LS1 Kahboy in forum Forced InductionReplies: 10Last Post: 03-25-2007, 08:59 AM
Bookmarks