Centrifugal Superchargers or twin crew
This is a discussion on Centrifugal Superchargers or twin crew within the Forced Induction forums, part of the LSx Technical Help Section category; i'm in a bit of a jam.i have a sleeper camaro z28(sorry no pics) it has a 383 8 to ...
02-25-2006, 12:20 PM #1
Centrifugal Superchargers or twin crewi'm in a bit of a jam.i have a sleeper camaro z28(sorry no pics) it has a 383 8 to 1 compression ratio and i'm ready for the super charger the problem is i want a twin crew but some say centrifugals are better.it is a daily driver and will see 18lbs of boost on the weekend will one give a better horse power number 700 hp is my goal and how much boost can i run with out racing fuel
Last edited by everett; 02-25-2006 at 12:31 PM.
03-01-2006, 11:36 AM #2
roots blowers give peak boost faster than a centrifugal supercharger. for a top mounted blower modification will be needed to be done to make this work, I've seen a few pics of it, it is capable but not very easy. And as far as twin screws go, IDK if magnachargers are twin or not. for a direct and easy purpose, I'd go centrifugal if I were you.
03-02-2006, 03:20 PM #3
were can i get more info on this
03-10-2006, 02:12 AM #4Originally Posted by everett
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=27 Check out this Trans-Am. BobCheck out our huge website at http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com
Your Midwest Moser Specialist - We price match!
Your Midwest ATI ProCharger Specialist - We only sell the best supercharger, the ATI ProCharger! We price match! 260 244-4808
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By peter@aps in forum CorvetteReplies: 3Last Post: 02-28-2006, 08:33 PM
By peter@aps in forum Forced InductionReplies: 0Last Post: 02-14-2006, 02:43 PM
By tbyrne in forum GTOReplies: 0Last Post: 01-10-2006, 03:43 PM
By peter@aps in forum CorvetteReplies: 14Last Post: 12-28-2005, 07:00 PM
By tbyrne in forum Sales and Group Purchases from our Great Sponsors!Replies: 0Last Post: 11-07-2005, 08:57 AM