Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: Weight Ratio
-
07-05-2008, 10:04 AM #1
Weight Ratio
Just curious what the Z28 weight ratio is. I've looked everywhere but I cant find it!!
-
07-06-2008, 12:43 AM #2
bump no one knows?
-
07-06-2008, 04:25 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hamburg, Germany
- Posts
- 2,521
Silver- 1998 Camaro Z28 A4
i don't know either, so i'm signing in. the cars are a bit nose heavy, so my guess would be in the 45/55% range.
-
07-06-2008, 04:44 AM #4
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- West Virginia
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 763
Pewter- Y2K WS6
I know the front springs are rated in the 300's and the rears at 150 for most springs. I'm going to say sitting as is it nears 60/40. Very nose heavy cars... they are much like a truck.. ( a low slung super sexy truck)
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showpost.p...82&postcount=5
-
07-06-2008, 04:54 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hamburg, Germany
- Posts
- 2,521
Silver- 1998 Camaro Z28 A4
probably not quite as a truck, but yeah, typical front engine car. and it's a big, heavy motor, even with the aluminium block. but if they put the engine further back, you could weld the radio directly on the block, so it's already pretty far back.
my solution: carry as much junk in the trunk as possible, puts more weight on the rear end.
-
07-06-2008, 07:04 AM #6
Ah damn. I was hoping it'd be more near 50/50
-
07-06-2008, 07:06 AM #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- rochester,ny
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 2,665
pewter- 2001 z28 lingenfelter 383
im puttin my guess in at 56/44 or 57/43 if i remember right
-
07-06-2008, 08:50 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hamburg, Germany
- Posts
- 2,521
Silver- 1998 Camaro Z28 A4
found something for the lt1 camaros: Z28 is 58/42%. so with the ls1 you'll be looking at 57/43 due to the lighter engine.
source: http://www.f-body.org/tech/tech.htm#FourthGen
-
07-06-2008, 02:13 PM #9
Here are the weights of my 99 measured with certified scales.
1850front/1550rear
or
54%/46% with rounding
-
07-06-2008, 02:14 PM #10
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Thornton, CO
- Posts
- 23,773
Red Tint Jewelcoat- 2008 Trailblazer SS
58/42
-
07-08-2008, 04:44 PM #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- West Virginia
- Age
- 44
- Posts
- 763
Pewter- Y2K WS6
Relocate battery to the rear. it can help a little.... 40 pounds is 40 pounds! ..... put a fat girl in the back seat... ...nope not worth it!
I've thought a few times about the ability to put a corvette rear & Trans in our cars. but would be a lot of frikin work. bottom line is i love the way the T/A looks!
-
07-08-2008, 04:53 PM #12
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Northern Va
- Posts
- 74
Mineral Grey- 2005 Mustang GT
Wow I am supriised 58/42 as far back as the engine sits, thats amaizing..
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
So much for the camaro weight.. New Mustang Weight
By Aetos in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 19Last Post: 12-01-2009, 06:24 PM -
So much for the camaro weight.. New Mustang Weight
By Aetos in forum Almost Anything GoesReplies: 2Last Post: 12-01-2009, 08:07 AM -
Question: Ratio?
By Crusty in forum Firebird / WS6Replies: 13Last Post: 10-19-2009, 06:35 PM -
Generally what is the HP/Weight Reduction ratio?
By xinthenight in forum General HelpReplies: 10Last Post: 08-30-2007, 06:27 PM -
Keep the weight or weight reduction?
By JwMonE99 in forum V6Replies: 3Last Post: 10-16-2006, 08:24 AM
Bookmarks