Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: Flowtech vs. Pacesetter
-
05-14-2006, 01:43 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Florida
- Age
- 43
- Posts
- 53
silver- 2000 Audi S4
Flowtech vs. Pacesetter
My next mod to my car will be lt's and off road y-pipe. I was wondering if anyone had some input as to which brand header to go with. My budget will allow pacesetter or flowtech lt's. The material on the pacesetter is slightly thicker than on the flowtechs but I wanted to see if anybody has experience as far as fitment and over all quality issues. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
-
05-14-2006, 01:56 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- n/w chicago
- Age
- 54
- Posts
- 6,932
black- 2000 nhra edition formula
pacesetters are the better value. mine had great welds and thick flanges.
they also went in minus any problems2000 nhra edition formula
a few bolt ons, 379 rwhp
11.96 @113.25
-
05-14-2006, 02:09 PM #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Boiling Springs SC
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 34
Pewter- 2001 WS.6 Trans AM
A good friend of mine has a set of Flowtechs and it took him about 9 hours to install them. Take for granted he didn't have a nice garage, a car lift, or for that matter any experience putting headers on a car at all. They came with pretty crappy gaskets so he had to buy some heavy duty gaskets at a parts store and the 02 extensions didn't come the same day as the headers so he wired his own extensions in. ( big mistake). after getting the correct extensions and finally getting the headers installed his car sounds like a beast with SLP loudmouth and has great flow. He spent less than $400 for everything.
[B]2K1 WS.6 m6: SLP Lid, MAF, smooth bellows, Y-Pipe, Loudmouth, 160 Stat, TB bypass, TR Velocity Stack, SLP Short Throw, K&N, Taylor 10mm wires w/ iridium NGK plugs, and 255lph F/P, Comp Cam, Chromemoly Rods, Comp Valve Springs
-
05-14-2006, 05:38 PM #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Florida
- Age
- 43
- Posts
- 53
silver- 2000 Audi S4
well I was looking at the flowtechs thru thunder racing and the black painted ones are $269.99 and they include gaskets, bolts, and o2 extensions. The pacesetters were from texas speed and they are $279.99 but as far as I understand they only come with gaskets and bolts. are the flowtechs a better deal or just cheaper?
-
05-14-2006, 05:59 PM #5
I'm going off of memory here and it's been a few years since I got mine but I'm thinking the pacesetters fit better than the flowtechs. The pacesetters came with O2 extensions but it's basically just wires for you to lenthen your stock wires. I STRONGLY suggest getting some premade extensions. I actually have the ones they sent me in the garage I think. You or anyone else can have them. I would also think about coated headers too.
The stock gaskets are better than the gaskets you'll get with any set of headers. I went and bought new gaskets from a dealer although mine still looked fine.
On the ground without a lift and your first time doing them plan on spending the whole day on them. There's multiple write ups on the web which are very helpful.
-
05-14-2006, 06:51 PM #6
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 81
Black- 98 Trans Am
Whatever you do...DO NOT BUY FLOWTECHS! The pacesetters are thicker, have better welds and have thicker flanges. They are a WAY better header. Only buy the flowtechs if you like exhaust leaks. The flowtechs are known to leak, and don't usually fit very well. I know of a few shops that won't even install them, because they are such a poor quality header and leak. The It depends on the car, but most of the time the pacesetters will drop right in. Mine slipped in with no modification. I would definately get the ceramic coating as well. Without it, the headers will rust real quick and you will put out more heat to the alternator and starter.
-
05-15-2006, 10:22 AM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- cali
- Posts
- 115
- 1990
I bought Flowtech longtubes for my car and it took a friend and me about 4 hours to install them. I paid $225 $100 for the y-pipe and they came with gaskets, bolts, and o2 extensions. Everything went on good, I even put on the gaskets that they came with and I have no leaks. I recommend getting them but get the ceramic coated ones.
-
05-15-2006, 11:11 AM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 81
Black- 98 Trans Am
Originally Posted by shady1504
-
05-15-2006, 06:25 PM #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Boiling Springs SC
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 34
Pewter- 2001 WS.6 Trans AM
Originally Posted by SLOW346
-
05-15-2006, 11:24 PM #10Snake EaterGuest
flowtechs are junk. you'll be more than happy with those pacesetters.
-
05-16-2006, 07:22 AM #11
pacesetters x2
-
05-16-2006, 03:51 PM #12
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- cali
- Posts
- 115
- 1990
Originally Posted by SLOW346
-
05-21-2006, 12:22 PM #13
Not to mention flowtechs solution to where there header used to hit the K member was denting it in that tube. (at least they used to, seen many pics)
-
05-21-2006, 02:08 PM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- california
- Posts
- 4
black- 2000 SS camaro
Pacesetter Lt's
-
05-23-2006, 02:50 PM #15
many sponsors stopped carring flowtechs due to they're poor clearance
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Question: Flowtech LT's
By 01SsRacing in forum External EngineReplies: 13Last Post: 06-08-2013, 06:48 AM -
Flowtech headers
By outlawZ28 in forum External EngineReplies: 9Last Post: 10-01-2009, 01:24 PM -
Flowtech Headers
By TransAmcoupe98 in forum External EngineReplies: 2Last Post: 06-02-2007, 07:07 PM -
Flowtech
By slpws6ta in forum External EngineReplies: 3Last Post: 01-07-2007, 01:32 PM -
pacesetter vs. flowtech
By GottaHaveLS1 in forum External EngineReplies: 6Last Post: 02-24-2006, 12:25 PM
Bookmarks