Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: AFR is this ok
-
07-10-2006, 08:58 AM #1Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- commerce twp michigan
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 546
AFR is this ok
Had a dyno tune with headers and new ls6 intake. Hows my AFR (ratio)
12.9 min 13.4 max 13.1 avg
? Is this in the ball park.
mustang dyno 336 hp 329.3 torqueLast edited by skar; 07-17-2006 at 05:39 PM. Reason: spelling
68 RS
-
07-30-2006, 01:00 PM #2Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- commerce twp michigan
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 546
yes no somebody
-
08-04-2006, 11:44 PM #3Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Cumming, GA
- Posts
- 182
Metallic Red- 2002 Corvette Coupe
13.1 sounds reasonable, but as for the other numbers since I have no idea what motor you're running (I assume LS1) or year or what it was originally rated at, it's pretty difficult to give any kind of reasonable opinion. It's important to give all relevant info if you want anything but a guess. Not all LS1's produce the same hp, for example LS1's in different year vettes can (and do) vary right out of the factory.
Michael
In GA waving from '02 C5 LS1, Z51, D1SC, 60lb injectors,RPM level 5-4L60E, 3:42, Yank 3600, QA1-12 ways, MTI long headers, high flow cats, Borlas, Wilwood, 603rwhp, 542rwtq.(DynoJet 248-C) 10.89@127.57 on street tires, Race Weight 3,640 lbs
-
08-06-2006, 09:28 AM #4Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- commerce twp michigan
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 546
thanks (99 ss ls1 see signature)
-
08-16-2006, 11:41 PM #5Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Cumming, GA
- Posts
- 182
Metallic Red- 2002 Corvette Coupe
Sorry. I must have missed that. Your numbers look good and are a substantial increase over 'stock'. The headers and intake were a good investment.
Originally Posted by skar
-
08-17-2006, 11:37 AM #6Visualize°Design°Create
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- DFW
- Posts
- 9,285
'18 CTS-V- '13 ZL1
to me, your numbers seem low, compare just my LM dyno (done on a mustang dyno) with yours and it was only a little less than you with headers and Ls6 intake. I know every car behaves differently to bolt-ons, as I have an Ls6 intake and stainless steel headers waiting to be installed. are your numbers SAE corrected? What were your numbers before the bolt-ons?
your A/F looks good on the avg at 13.1. 13.4 is a little high (not danger)which means you are running lean at those RPM's where it's 13.4 (too high means you could burn a hole in the piston, and other internal wear problems over a long period of time). having an A/F around the high 12 to low 13's is where these cars need to be.2018 CTS-V: °°668rwhp/658rwtq°°
2013 ZL1: °°590rwhp/576rwtq°°
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."
-
08-17-2006, 05:04 PM #7Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- commerce twp michigan
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 546
SSwt00SS
303 rwhp with loudmouth and slp lid 308 tQ
? was told air temp humidity also factors in what numbers you get.
ALSO my loud mouth sounded like shit with headers.
-
08-29-2006, 09:13 AM #8Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- commerce twp michigan
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 546
[QUOTE=SSwt00SS;.[/QUOTE]
Post your dyno numbers after headers and intake install.
-
09-15-2006, 04:44 PM #9Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- commerce twp michigan
- Age
- 66
- Posts
- 546
I had the car checked and re tuned. Now or today 12.9 min 13.2 max and 13.0 avg lost 10 hp today is September 15 last tune was in march
? different day different season same car and mods same mustang dyno.
dyno man said this is what the car runs best at.
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks