PDA

View Full Version : Why is it so hard to get a mustang to race?


speedaddict
12-21-2005, 04:59 PM
Any one Know why mustang owners are so scared?:hide:

speedaddict
12-21-2005, 05:05 PM
Not to mention a guy in my neighborhood with a damn civic swears it faster than my ws6. How much mods and money would go into a civic just to get it to hang?

Marc87GN
12-21-2005, 05:23 PM
Any one Know why mustang owners are so scared?:hide:

You wouldn't have that problem on the east coast.

01mmmz28
12-21-2005, 05:40 PM
It's not so much that they are scared, they may have just learner thier lesson already, just remember, there is always someone faster and one day he might be in a stang.

01mmmz28
12-21-2005, 05:46 PM
depends what kinda civic he has?? Most run 17's stock, so to chop off 4 full seconds to match your stock times, he would have to have a bad ass turbo and all the supporting crap( intercooler, intake, cam(s), tuning, etc....) IMO, he would be spending 7-8k on parts and another 1-2k on labor unless he does it himself, in which case it will run like crap most likely cause 99% of ricer fags can't even change their oil much less take a engine apart and put it back together.

mogs01gt
12-21-2005, 05:51 PM
most mustang owners I know do not street race and or will only race for cash.

chaman
12-21-2005, 05:53 PM
Because they are all a bunck of fucking fags, goddamnit thats why!

































J/K....in fact Mustangs sound so sweeeet...I wish my LS1 could sound like those MOFOs!! LOL!

redls1bird
12-21-2005, 06:20 PM
it doesnt take 7-8 grand to get a civic down to good times. it just takes research and patience. Just like a guy i worked with had a civic hatchback, (excuse my ignorance of import terms..) fully gutted, jdm gsr spec head, turbo (intercooled) pieced together by him, not a kit, "stand alone" fuel management, upgraded fuel pump and injectors and some other odds and ends. on mt drags (on the front of course, looked silly as hell) he could bust into the 11.90's (at about 28 psi if i remember correctly) all on a budget of 3500-4000 dollars, not including the car. on street trim with pump gas he would run in the neighborhood 15-20 psi and run high 12s and low 13's, on street tires. not too shabby for a "ricer"

ZAPFOOL!!
12-21-2005, 07:24 PM
it doesnt take 7-8 grand to get a civic down to good times. it just takes research and patience. Just like a guy i worked with had a civic hatchback, (excuse my ignorance of import terms..) fully gutted, jdm gsr spec head, turbo (intercooled) pieced together by him, not a kit, "stand alone" fuel management, upgraded fuel pump and injectors and some other odds and ends. on mt drags (on the front of course, looked silly as hell) he could bust into the 11.90's (at about 28 psi if i remember correctly) all on a budget of 3500-4000 dollars, not including the car. on street trim with pump gas he would run in the neighborhood 15-20 psi and run high 12s and low 13's, on street tires. not too shabby for a "ricer"


Its not a ricer if they are actually a car guy/girl and the car is built well, gotta give respect when they earn it.

white1
12-22-2005, 05:59 AM
Cause they are slow:lol: I have a 2000 RC Z-71, and for teh most part, most mustangs around here cant hang. Cammed, exhaust, geared etc. We have a Bullit in the car club, but he always has traction issues IE cant drive:dunno: They all catch me on the big end, but in the 1/4 they arent too much. We do have some Im scared of though, they arent all slow, but I guess if I sprayed my truck like they spray their cars it might be different:drivin:

SR71
12-22-2005, 06:51 AM
amen

BIG D's SS
12-22-2005, 07:00 AM
You wouldn't have that problem on the east coast.

Hell that is all I get to race is Mustangs. I want to race something else.

third_shift|studios
12-22-2005, 08:29 AM
prolly a lot of V6's also, there ar a lot of tool-bags out there who said " i wanna sports car, this is pretty" and don't know what it means when an fbod comes up next to them and revs it.

Zboner
12-22-2005, 08:30 AM
no mustangs will race me it seems like no matter what

Firehawk1120
12-22-2005, 03:12 PM
I have noticed 2 things with most mustang drivers around here. The ones that sound nice and actually have power are driven by adults who are smart enough not to race on the street anymore. The rest are either women, young punks who are out driving daddy's car and can't race or they loose priveleges, or V6's that know they can't run with an LS1.

Call me crazy but there aren't many young kids with the cajones and the bucks to be able to race.

speedaddict
12-22-2005, 03:21 PM
yeah

BAMF
12-22-2005, 07:06 PM
I've had some kid in a '99 stang want to race me so he could see how far he had to go to run with a LS1, I told him to back up to the end of the block:lol:

rickyhaiber
12-23-2005, 09:01 PM
you all think your shit doesnt stink...but i'd race any of you in my '94 cobra with a T76 on it....ill even turn the boost down to 10psi for ya, and youll be wondering why you bought such an ugly car and got your ass smoked..haha jk...but i would probley beat most of you...so you all havent run into the right ones yet, keep lookin'

Fastcar
12-23-2005, 09:14 PM
you all think your shit doesnt stink...but i'd race any of you in my '94 cobra with a T76 on it....ill even turn the boost down to 10psi for ya, and youll be wondering why you bought such an ugly car and got your ass smoked..haha jk...but i would probley beat most of you...so you all havent run into the right ones yet, keep lookin'

What a losing poser! No Ford boards out there so you have to read a GM board and try to bait us? You wouldn't be worth wasting my gas on. Go get a life and play with the little boys with their little toys. You can mod any car, but a STOCK LS1 will blow away a STOCK 5 liter Mustang anytime! I guess you didn't know any better or didn't have enough money so you bought a Ford instead...... :lol:

rickyhaiber
12-23-2005, 09:29 PM
well theres a million motors that will beat an LS1 stock...so whats your point? which would mean that it wasnt worth buying your ugly ass car? just b/c something was faster stock? oooookay, great points you fvcking dumbass!
get over it LS1s are old, chevy has made so many motors that beat it now and what about all the new SRT-8s? they would fuck your shit up, man....so get over the fact you paid so much for an ugly car

rickyhaiber
12-23-2005, 09:41 PM
and if you wanna find a mustang to race take a look over on turbomustangs.com ... im sure even you LS1 guys will find something that would stomp you....theres plenty over there

silverTA2002
12-23-2005, 09:58 PM
Because if they wanted to race, they'd have bought a FAST car. :D


J/K. Honestly though, there are a ton of Mustang guys that'll race, and a ton that'll easily beat me. Those Cobra guys come to mind.

On the other hand, there are quite a few GT owners who'll never race. It's kinda like most vette owners out there, very few will race. I think I've only raced ONE vette in the last 4 years.

silverTA2002
12-23-2005, 09:59 PM
If you have a hard time finding races, just act like a jackass.

Rev your engine, and yell something stupid out the window. "Your car sucks!" Never tried it, but it seems like it'd work. ;)

Fastcar
12-23-2005, 11:32 PM
you all think your shit doesnt stink...'

Congratulations! Yeah, I've gotta admit you're right! My s*** doesn't stink as bad as your car does! At least I now know that you've got 1 fact right! :lol:

chaman
12-24-2005, 09:37 AM
well theres a million motors that will beat an LS1 stock...so whats your point? which would mean that it wasnt worth buying your ugly ass car? just b/c something was faster stock? oooookay, great points you fvcking dumbass!
get over it LS1s are old, chevy has made so many motors that beat it now and what about all the new SRT-8s? they would fuck your shit up, man....so get over the fact you paid so much for an ugly car


Ugly car?? I'm sorry but my TA will turn heads everywhere instead of your Rustang which you and everybody else's mother has:dunno: The fact remains Rustangs are way underpowered from factory (except Cobras). The new Rustang with 300hp?? is that a joke? Dude there are SUVs out there with more power!!:slap: LOSER!

Ric
12-24-2005, 11:46 AM
Honestly, Mustangs are slow. GTs are slow. Modded GTs aren't as slow. Mach Is are decent. '03-'04 Cobras will have the edge on a stock LS1.

I guess to answer your question... because they aren't in either a Mach I or Cobra.

fredg369
12-24-2005, 11:53 AM
The only mustang owners that talk shit are the cobra owners with their super chargers.
Wonder what a LS1 super charged could do to the cobra.
Fords been behind in the HP department since 1993 when the 275hp LT-1 was put into the f-body.....The last F-body was in 2002 putting out 335hp LS1 ram air.
3 years later ford still only has 300hp.......The only way to get good power out of them is with forced induction.
I also read something about the hemi...given trouble to the LS1.....I don't think so.
Took out a 300c with my 95 LT-1 formula M6 (sold it now).....Ya the srt-8 with 420hp might be another story.Dollar for dollar you won't see to many of them around with the 45K to 50K price tag.
My SUV comes in around 4500lbs with its 395hp LS2 AWD and it moves...The srt-8 charger comes in around the same weight and its a car...400hp is the right combo for this weight class.

silverTA2002
12-24-2005, 06:50 PM
The only mustang owners that talk shit are the cobra owners with their super chargers.
Wonder what a LS1 super charged could do to the cobra.
Fords been behind in the HP department since 1993 when the 275hp LT-1 was put into the f-body.....The last F-body was in 2002 putting out 335hp LS1 ram air.
3 years later ford still only has 300hp.......The only way to get good power out of them is with forced induction.
I also read something about the hemi...given trouble to the LS1.....I don't think so.
Took out a 300c with my 95 LT-1 formula M6 (sold it now).....Ya the srt-8 with 420hp might be another story.Dollar for dollar you won't see to many of them around with the 45K to 50K price tag.
My SUV comes in around 4500lbs with its 395hp LS2 AWD and it moves...The srt-8 charger comes in around the same weight and its a car...400hp is the right combo for this weight class.

People just need to learn to give credit where it's due.

The 03+ Cobra is fast.

I can't believe you pulled out the "imagine an LS1 with a supercharger" argument. :thumbdn:

You might as well say, "imagine a 2001 Cobra with 5.7 liters."

Power is power. Forced induction is one way to do it, displacement is another. What matters in the end is:

How much power you make
Reliability
Cost
Fuel economy
Modibility
Weight
etc.

How you get these things??? Who cares? As long as you've got em.

In terms of overall power and how cheap and easy an 03 Cobra is to mod, that makes me jealous. I'm just giving credit where it's due.

Also, the TB SS is very sweet (my brother has one). BUT, an SRT-8 charger would blow your doors off. I'm not sure why you brought that one up.

jwindbigler
12-24-2005, 07:02 PM
geeze im sorry, but the WS6 trans am is THE BEST looking sports car out there right now. for the price anyway. now if you are strictly talking between an 05 stang and an 02 trans am WS6. im sorry junior, but the trans am has it hands down in all categories. so go sit down shut up, and go back to your petty ford boards. peace

rickyhaiber
12-26-2005, 12:53 AM
man good one jwindbigler, youre a funny guy....but i'd race you with my 94 cobra any day....and like i said, ill turn the boost on the T76 turbo down to around the 10-12 psi range just for your ugly ass f-body.....and I wont use the 50 shot i have to get that turbo spooling up quick....i see you live in san diego, you wanna put your money where your fat mouth is? or any of you with you mostly stock ls1's who talk so much shit? cuz your not fast!!!! 3XXHP is not fast! unless you wanna run 13's for the rest of your sad life...i dunno maybe you do, but get over this "mustangs are slow stock", well i good for them, i guess you can run stock cars the rest of your life if it makes your slow ass happy!
ill give it to you, that a modded ls1 is fast, but unless you have some pretty good mods im going to blow your ugly doors off that p.o.s. f-body pig of a car
HAAHAAHAA, you guys make me sick with your slow pieces of $h!t!!!!!

rickyhaiber
12-26-2005, 12:56 AM
p.s. whats up with the goofy hoods they put on your cars? is it worth the measly 20 or so HP to make your car so dumb looking? just curious b/c i laugh every time i blow one of those ws6 ls1's away and have to look at it in my rearview
camaros arent so bad, but trans ams are goofy, too many little scoops and curves..they look queer

Marc87GN
12-26-2005, 08:08 AM
Oh boy, this is going to go well. :Popcorn:

jwrandall
12-26-2005, 09:35 AM
i see you live in san diego, you wanna put your money where your fat mouth is?

So, you're calling out someone who lives thousands of miles away? If you're going to drive out there just to race, and then drive back, you're dumber than I first thought. Who is this assclown?

Ed Blown Vert
12-26-2005, 09:47 AM
man good one jwindbigler, youre a funny guy....but i'd race you with my 94 cobra any day....and like i said, ill turn the boost on the T76 turbo down to around the 10-12 psi range just for your ugly ass f-body.....and I wont use the 50 shot i have to get that turbo spooling up quick....i see you live in san diego, you wanna put your money where your fat mouth is? or any of you with you mostly stock ls1's who talk so much shit? cuz your not fast!!!! 3XXHP is not fast! unless you wanna run 13's for the rest of your sad life...i dunno maybe you do, but get over this "mustangs are slow stock", well i good for them, i guess you can run stock cars the rest of your life if it makes your slow ass happy!
ill give it to you, that a modded ls1 is fast, but unless you have some pretty good mods im going to blow your ugly doors off that p.o.s. f-body pig of a car
HAAHAAHAA, you guys make me sick with your slow pieces of $h!t!!!!!


Lets see some pics and specs.

Jeep41
12-26-2005, 09:58 AM
Ed, c'mon.. ;)

http://www.shoujorobot.com/archival/sadatroll.gif

:D

This thread is reminding me more and more of Streetmaster and the '98-'02 era on LS1!

1) Someone saying a FBod is ugly - CHECK!
2) Someone saying their late model, worked over Fox Body/ SN95 will beat a stock FBod -CHECK!
3) Absolutely no pictures, time slips or other physical proof given to back up any ascertation- CHECK!


Looks like it to me :drivin:

Lets see some pics and specs.

Originally Posted by rickyhaiber
man good one jwindbigler, youre a funny guy....but i'd race you with my 94 cobra any day....and like i said, ill turn the boost on the T76 turbo down to around the 10-12 psi range just for your ugly ass f-body.....and I wont use the 50 shot i have to get that turbo spooling up quick....i see you live in san diego, you wanna put your money where your fat mouth is? or any of you with you mostly stock ls1's who talk so much shit? cuz your not fast!!!! 3XXHP is not fast! unless you wanna run 13's for the rest of your sad life...i dunno maybe you do, but get over this "mustangs are slow stock", well i good for them, i guess you can run stock cars the rest of your life if it makes your slow ass happy!
ill give it to you, that a modded ls1 is fast, but unless you have some pretty good mods im going to blow your ugly doors off that p.o.s. f-body pig of a car
HAAHAAHAA, you guys make me sick with your slow pieces of $h!t!!!!!

Ed Blown Vert
12-26-2005, 10:05 AM
Can you tell I am bored :)

Street Lethal
12-26-2005, 01:08 PM
You might as well say, "imagine a 2001 Cobra with 5.7 liters".

Interesting. I have a recorded interview with Coletti stating that the designer's worked extremely hard on the 03-04 Cobra's engine design... and even after a variety of engine configuration's (eg; longer stroke, and/or more cubic inches), "we just couldn't achieve the same power level as we could with the blower".

In the end though I'd have to agree, more cubes equals more power, regardless of which engine design one goes with. But then again, Chevy had absolutely no problem with making almost two horsepower per cubic inch with it's naturally aspirated 302, once upon a time. ;)

john
12-26-2005, 02:22 PM
Interesting. I have a recorded interview with Coletti stating that the designer's worked extremely hard on the 03-04 Cobra's engine design... and even after a variety of engine configuration's (eg; longer stroke, and/or more cubic inches), "we just couldn't achieve the same power level as we could with the blower".

In the end though I'd have to agree, more cubes equals more power, regardless of which engine design one goes with. But then again, Chevy had absolutely no problem with making almost two horsepower per cubic inch with it's naturally aspirated 302, once upon a time. ;)

Do you mean the 290bhp 302 made in 67-69? Even the race cars didn't make the 600 horse power you are claiming. Chevy rated them at 450bhp. And keep in mind hp ratings in the 60's were SAE GROSS, not SAE NET as they are now.

Reading is Fundamental:

http://www.holisticpage.com/camaro/camaros/302.htm


As for the Cobra using a blower to make power, Coletti was right. They probably couldn't make more than the 390bhp the blown 4.6l makes with a 5.4l (the only larger motor that was realistically an option). Chevy didn't do it with the LS1 either despite it being 5.7l, they went with the hotter LS6 or larger LS2 for 400+bhp.

An engine is just an air pump. It pumps in air/fuel mixture and burns it. Assuming the same efficiency for extracting energy from the air/fuel mix, the more of it the engine pumps, the more power it makes.

You can increase power by:

Making the engine larger. Each cylinder now pulls in more air/fuel and therefore extracts more power.

Make it rev higher. If you use an engine of 1l and an engine of 2l, rev the smaller engine twice as fast as the bigger one and it should make the same power. Assuming all supporting components can keep up with the air flow velocity required.

Boost it. You can force twice as much air/fuel into the motor by double the intake pressure with forced induction.

He went with boost, as the Ford guys that have supercharged Mustangs are glad he did. It's a lot easier to bump up boost then make your engine bigger, or make it all stay in one piece by trying to rev it twice as high.

john

Street Lethal
12-26-2005, 02:52 PM
Do you mean the 290bhp 302 made in 67-69? Even the race cars didn't make the 600 horse power you are claiming.

Umm, no John, I was not referring to the Cross-Ram 302's that were being sold from the factory. As far it's "race car" version not making the "600 horsepower that I'm claiming", why not re-inspect my statement. I stated almost two horsepower per cubic inch, not two horsepower per cubic inch. If you'd kindly remove you're head from you're rear, you'd realize that there's a significant difference.

Chevy rated them at 450bhp.

Underrated. By the way, that's still 1.5 horsepower per cubic inch. You're arguement is plastic...

And keep in mind hp ratings in the 60's were SAE GROSS, not SAE NET as they are now.

Hmm, would this anology also apply to the 1970 454 Chevelle... being completely underrated by chevy at a mere 450 horsepower, but clearly making over 500? :rolleyes:

The rest of you're pathetic arguement is just smoke and mirrors on you're part. Thanks, it's been fun though. Really, it has.... ;)

BIG D's SS
12-26-2005, 02:56 PM
That is one more reason that I hate Mustang guys. That guy probably doesn't even own a Mustang. he probably has an escort and is just so jealous for some reason that he doesn't have an LS1 car or even a Mustang for that matter. Back up your mouth and we might believe you just a little. Till then don't talk shit. I'm not that far away to drive up there and bust your ass.

john
12-26-2005, 03:17 PM
Umm, no John, I was not referring to the Cross-Ram 302's that were being sold from the factory.



Well then, which one?



As far it's "race car" version not making the "600 horsepower that I'm claiming", why not re-inspect my statement. I stated almost two horsepower per cubic inch, not two horsepower per cubic inch. If you'd kindly remove you're head from you're rear, you'd realize that there's a significant difference.

Underrated. By the way, that's still 1.5 horsepower per cubic inch.


There is indeed a significant difference. One is a bold, unsubstantiated, talk out your ass claim, the other is back peddling because you got called on it.

My head it not up my rear.



You're arguement is plastic...



I have no idea what that means.



Hmm, would this anology also apply to the 1970 454 Chevelle... being completely underrated by chevy at a mere 450 horsepower, but clearly making over 500? :rolleyes:



My point was SAE Gross figures are not the same as SAE Net. Are you disputing that?


The rest of you're pathetic arguement is just smoke and mirrors on you're part.


What was "smoke and mirrors"?


Thanks, it's been fun though. Really, it has.... ;)


I hope it's been educational as well.

Street Lethal
12-26-2005, 03:30 PM
John, you know perfectly well after reading my response that I was not referring to the factory Cross-rammed 302's. I was initially referring to Smokey Yunick. Claiming "almost 2 horsepower per cubic inch" on my part, I was embellishing on the 1.7 to 1.8 mark... as it is my understanding, as well as other Yunick fans, that Yunick clearly emphasized "way over 500 horsepower", in reference to Chevy's high-winding 302, after they were finished with it.

john
12-26-2005, 03:36 PM
John, you know perfectly well after reading my response that I was not referring to the factory Cross-rammed 302's. I was initially referring to Smokey Yunick. Claiming "almost 2 horsepower per cubic inch" on my part, I was embellishing on the 1.7 to 1.8 mark... as it is my understanding, as well as other Yunick fans, that Yunick clearly emphasized "way over 500 horsepower", in reference to Chevy's high-winding 302, after they were finished with it.


That's more believable. However, I don't think SVT has had the same freedoms. They are really a factory tuner, not after market. Being the age of political correctness SVT also has to content with modern emmisions laws, unleaded low octane gas and CAFE standards. Overall I think they do a pretty kick ass job.

chaman
12-26-2005, 04:46 PM
p.s. whats up with the goofy hoods they put on your cars? is it worth the measly 20 or so HP to make your car so dumb looking? just curious b/c i laugh every time i blow one of those ws6 ls1's away and have to look at it in my rearview
camaros arent so bad, but trans ams are goofy, too many little scoops and curves..they look queer

So sad this POS bitch is banned. I hope he comes back and explains this thread. The bitch has been looking for a TA, yes a TA, and evened mentioned he needs to sell his Cobra. Why?? aint TA ugly and slow?? Fucking loser. I aint got nothing more to say. I wont even bother answering (if you do) whatever stupid thing your ass-like mouth has to say. Get the fuck out of here!

http://ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5038
http://ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=80812#post80812

Guy was also asking for a SS also.......POS!!!!

Devylyst
12-26-2005, 07:57 PM
Lol maybe it wasnt him, probaly a die hard my little pony fan got on his comp, said the LS1.com bookmark and attempted to trash talk the beloved Fbodies.