Aston Martin -v8 Sc Tried To Run Me

[breakparts]

I WAS SCARED WHEN I SAW SC V8 ON HIS CAR---IT WAS AN ASTON MARTIN 2 SEATER---it was very stylish and when he revved, the sc was loud...but not like the terminator....THIS GUY WAS DOING A STAGING BURNOUT FOR TRACTION,,I GUESS...BUT HE SEEMED TO BE SMOKING THE SHIT OUT OF HIS TIRES.....AND WHEN THE LIGHT WENT......IT SEEMED HE HEATED HIS TIRES TOO MUCH...after i feathered 1st gear and put her in 2nd he got traction.....way too late......

so i gave him another try, and he didnt heat the tires this time......he got good traction this time but i was pulling way too fast to count how far he was behind......by 3rd gear i was gone and decided to get out of the area.....

but those things blow ass...my buddy said the v-12 sc would kill me...but i dunno, i handed the v8 his ass pretty badly....:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:

[ss~zoso~ss]

umm yea i'd say a super charged v 12 would whoop your ass

what is the hp rating on the car you raced

[breakparts]

Well I Thought A Sc V8 Of That Kind Should Have Done It

[FireChicken2000]

Engine:
- All alloy quad overhead camshaft 32 valve, 4.3 litre V8
- Variable inlet camshaft timing
- Dry sump lubrication system
- Fully catalysed stainless steel exhaust system with active bypass valves
- Front-mid mounted engine
- Rear wheel drive

Projected Performance figures:
- Maximum power: 283kW (380 bhp / 385 PS) @ 7300 rpm
- Maximum torque: (302 lb.ft) @ 5000 rpm
- Maximum speed: (175 mph)
- 0-60 mph in 5.0 seconds
- 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 5.0 seconds

Is this the car you ran?
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e55/king444/martin.jpg

the V 12 stats:

All alloy, quad overhead camshaft, 48-valve, 5935cc 60° V12 front engine, rear-wheel drive
Twin PTEC engine management system controlling fuel-injection, ignition and diagnostics
Fully catalysed stainless steel exhaust system with active by-pass valves
Compression ratio: 10.8:1
Maximum power: (520 bhp) at 7000 rpm
Maximum torque: (425 lb.ft) at 5800 rpm
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 4.7 seconds;
0-160 km/h (100 mph) in 9.8 seconds
Maximum speed: Over 200 mph

v 12 sounds pretty fast all though theres faster

[breakparts]

good info- that sc v-12 sounds bad ass-the pics dint come up-BUT FROM THOSE SPECS I THINK THERES A CHANCE ILL PULL HIM -till 160 that is of course

[FireChicken2000]

kinda sad you know that car is like 150,000 dollars car then you got the Z06 pulling times like this form the factory
2006 Chevrolet Corvette ZO6 0 to 60:3.5, 1/4 mile:11.5 (MT Oct '05)

kinda pointless to spend the money on the martin

[breakparts]

Yah But You Dont See Them Every Day---and Thats Why They Pay Top Dollar---and 75 % Of People Think The More Expensive The Faster And Mor Luxurious The Car---well Even If Its Comfortable At 150,000 , Losing To An F Body Would Make The Whole Car Feel Like Shit

[GottaHaveLS1]

good info- that sc v-12 sounds bad ass-the pics dint come up-BUT FROM THOSE SPECS I THINK THERES A CHANCE ILL PULL HIM -till 160 that is of course

I doubt it

[Zboner]

whats your mods?

[third_shift|studios]

wow, sweet kill!

[jacobyb]

kinda sad you know that car is like 150,000 dollars car then you got the Z06 pulling times like this form the factory
2006 Chevrolet Corvette ZO6 0 to 60:3.5, 1/4 mile:11.5 (MT Oct '05)

kinda pointless to spend the money on the martin

The point of the Aston Martin is not all out speed. It is a Grand Touring car that is meant for long highway trips at higher speeds. Think of it as a more sport tuned Bently Turbo R for half the price.

[01T-TopToy]

kinda sad you know that car is like 150,000 dollars car then you got the Z06 pulling times like this form the factory
2006 Chevrolet Corvette ZO6 0 to 60:3.5, 1/4 mile:11.5 (MT Oct '05)

kinda pointless to spend the money on the martin

Heh, you ever driven your F-body long term ? I drove a 97 Vert from New Hampshire to Washington state a few years back... Don't get me wrong I LOVE the F-body. Hell I still own one... But a Luxury touring vehicle it is NOT.
I had a 93 Cobra that was a better long distance driver than my 01 SS. Thats NOT what I bought it for tho, I bought it for the obvious reasons.
You simply cannot compare the two cars that way, anymore than you can a super modded cavalier that outran a stock Z06.. yeah its fast the Vette owner thinks, but....it's a cavalier. Just my .02 cents

[ttadriver]

Heh, you ever driven your F-body long term ? I drove a 97 Vert from New Hampshire to Washington state a few years back... Don't get me wrong I LOVE the F-body. Hell I still own one... But a Luxury touring vehicle it is NOT.
I had a 93 Cobra that was a better long distance driver than my 01 SS. Thats NOT what I bought it for tho, I bought it for the obvious reasons.
You simply cannot compare the two cars that way, anymore than you can a super modded cavalier that outran a stock Z06.. yeah its fast the Vette owner thinks, but....it's a cavalier. Just my .02 cents

My thoughts exactly

----
2004 MB E500
1997 Viper GTS B/W
1993 Mustang Cobra teal blue
1989 Anniv Turbo Trans Am hardtop

[breakparts]

im full bolt ons and an ms3, with a bolt on tune still-----YES ITS VERRY TRUE OUR CAMAROS WITH SUSPENSION ARE NOT VERRY GOOD ON LONG DISTANCES----IF you lower it the stress will come