PDA

View Full Version : porche beat, barely


cjg454ss
01-23-2006, 12:47 PM
i ran a new porche twin turbo carrera s on I75 new bradenton, fl. we both hit it about 65mph and he pulled about a half car to about 100 and then by 145 i have him by 1 car and moving out. it was my first kill in the new ss.

oh yeah its an auto, 02 ss, all slp options, free mods.

third_shift|studios
01-23-2006, 02:03 PM
wow! that's fucking bad ass!!!

MikeSomething
01-23-2006, 02:07 PM
Can't wait to see everyone elses' feedback on this one... Great kill man, I ran some kid and his gf in a black Boxter...looked pretty new, but I don't think he really gave it his all after we went past the 120mph mark. They're great touring cars, but I don't think they have enough low end to do the 1/4 mile thing from a dead stop...could be wrong...anyone? anyone?

john
01-23-2006, 02:21 PM
i ran a new porche twin turbo carrera s on I75 new bradenton, fl. we both hit it about 65mph and he pulled about a half car to about 100 and then by 145 i have him by 1 car and moving out. it was my first kill in the new ss.

oh yeah its an auto, 02 ss, all slp options, free mods.


:bs:

or not a Turbo.

ttadriver
01-23-2006, 02:29 PM
Of course anything can happen in a street race, but a twin turbo 911 should have been able to pull away and never look back. Especially if it was a twin turbo 911 S, which has more HP that the standard 911 tt. Nice kill anyway.


1989 Anniv Turbo TA hardtop
1997 Viper GTS B/W
2004 Evolution

jomo
01-23-2006, 03:00 PM
A 911 tt S has about 450+hp and a top speed of over a 185mph.
What have you done to your car?

FastAssZ
01-23-2006, 03:10 PM
444 horse and 457 tourqe in a 3500 pound car, no way possible did u pull that with an 02 ss with the slp options. even with headers intake and headers u couldnt pull that. maybe it was just the carrera s .... 355 horse 295 tourqe 3100 pound car. none turbo

cjg454ss
01-23-2006, 04:34 PM
i was quite surprised. the car went 8.2s stock at 87 mph in the 1/8. i talked to the guy it was a turbo and i saw him shifting(exhaust blowing out the back)

5150
01-23-2006, 04:44 PM
good kill

Street Lethal
01-23-2006, 07:28 PM
1989 Anniv Turbo TA hardtop
1997 Viper GTS B/W
2004 Evolution

Nice collection. Had my eye on an 89-TTA for a very long time, but didn't have the heart to molester it... and I'm definitely not one to leave things stock (so I didn't even bother). By the way, welcome aboard. :beer:

444 horse and 457 tourqe in a 3500 pound car, no way possible did u pull that with an 02 ss with the slp options. even with headers intake and headers u couldnt pull that.

Agreed. Although I'm sure he's able to tell a turbo Porsche from a non-Turbo Porsche.... let's just ass-u-me that it's driver let off much earlier than suggested. ;)

camaro_ss_97_
01-23-2006, 08:15 PM
nice

blue02Z
01-23-2006, 08:33 PM
Hard to believe but some crazy ass shit can happen on the streets, from a 70 punch a benz cl65 amg only pulled a car on me. anyway nice kill.

Danger731
01-23-2006, 08:40 PM
Hard to believe but some crazy ass shit can happen on the streets, from a 70 punch a benz cl65 amg only pulled a car on me. anyway nice kill.
damn amazing luck !

cjg454ss
01-24-2006, 05:49 AM
im sure he was in it because he pulled a 160 mph fly by after i let up and kept going.

ttadriver
01-24-2006, 08:15 AM
Street Lethal

Thanks. I've owned my TTA for approx 11 years now. I just have some mild modifications on it, nothing I can't revert back to stock.


1989 anniv turbo ta hardtop
1997 Viper GTS B/W
2004 Evolution

MikeSomething
01-24-2006, 11:45 AM
Street Lethal

Thanks. I've owned my TTA for approx 11 years now. I just have some mild modifications on it, nothing I can't revert back to stock.


1989 anniv turbo ta hardtop
1997 Viper GTS B/W
2004 Evolution


Anything done to the Viper?

ttadriver
01-24-2006, 02:14 PM
MikeSomething

No mods. Completely stock at 15K miles. If I do anything, it would be mild modifications ie exhaust

1989 anniv turbo ta hardtop
1997 Viper GTS B/W
2004 Evolution

cars previously owned:
2003.5 BMW M3 smg
1999 C5 frc
1987 Pontiac fiero gt fastback

MikeSomething
01-25-2006, 04:12 PM
MikeSomething

No mods. Completely stock at 15K miles. If I do anything, it would be mild modifications ie exhaust

1989 anniv turbo ta hardtop
1997 Viper GTS B/W
2004 Evolution

cars previously owned:
2003.5 BMW M3 smg
1999 C5 frc
1987 Pontiac fiero gt fastback

I would go for some nice aftermarket suspension for it, heard they don't handle that well. REALLY nice car though!

sk8runeg
01-27-2006, 10:10 PM
I would go for some nice aftermarket suspension for it, heard they don't handle that well. REALLY nice car though!

Whoever told you that vipers dont handle well probably couldnt tell their ass from their elbow even if they were labeled with post-its...

Vipers have always had .96g's and above on the skidpad, and I think there was only one year with it that low...

So, in other words, vipers handle incredibly.

-Scott

MikeSomething
01-29-2006, 10:39 AM
Whoever told you that vipers dont handle well probably couldnt tell their ass from their elbow even if they were labeled with post-its...

Vipers have always had .96g's and above on the skidpad, and I think there was only one year with it that low...

So, in other words, vipers handle incredibly.

-Scott

Road & Track must not be able to tell their ass from their elbow then...

sk8runeg
01-29-2006, 11:23 AM
i've noticed that road and track can't drive for shit. best they got on a new Z06 for 0-60 was 3.9 and they got 11.9 for 1/4, when motor trend and car and driver both got 3.4/3.5 and 11.4/11.5.

Capster78
01-29-2006, 07:37 PM
your full of it. A porche TT would walk away prety bad from a stock TA.

996TTx50
01-30-2006, 06:13 PM
A porche TT would walk away prety bad from a stock TA.
+1

996TTx50

Scottslt1z28
02-05-2006, 01:58 PM
it was no turbo........400whp (x50) and lighter than out cars............the physics dont add up. Plus those motors make linear power than ours soooo it would take u up top more than down low......considering thats where they were built do shine

trust me, a friend of mine has one.............and a 03 carrera 4s.

u did not race a turbo (if your car is stock)

Quicksilver
02-05-2006, 04:55 PM
:bs:

cjg454ss
02-05-2006, 09:54 PM
it was no turbo........400whp (x50) and lighter than out cars............the physics doesnt add up. Plus those motors make power more linear than ours soooo it would take u up top more than down low......

trust me, a friend of mine has one.............and a 03 carrera 4s.

u did not race a turbo (if your car is stock)


cars not stock

Scottslt1z28
02-06-2006, 10:07 PM
cars not stock


slp upgrades and free mods dont count.........that is stock enough.

Dude, trust me. Unless you just want to be ignorant to the fact. U didnt kill a 996 turbo. it was possibly a carrera s, but even you would hard pressed to take it down at those speeds (100-150)

cjg454ss
02-07-2006, 08:43 AM
slp upgrades and free mods dont count.........that is stock enough.

Dude, trust me. Unless you just want to be ignorant to the fact. U didnt kill a 996 turbo. it was possibly a carrera s, but even you would hard pressed to take it down at those speeds (100-150)

longtubes, y-pipe, cat back, lid, mass air, ported throttle body, dyno tune, mild weight reductions, ls6 intake, sfc, shift kit. Thats my mods and it put more than 360 to the wheels, I would not call that stock. Im tuning in a 150 rwhp on the dyno at the moment, but its still stock right:lol:

Scottslt1z28
02-07-2006, 11:57 AM
longtubes, y-pipe, cat back, lid, mass air, ported throttle body, dyno tune, mild weight reductions, ls6 intake, sfc, shift kit. Thats my mods and it put more than 360 to the wheels, I would not call that stock. Im tuning in a 150 rwhp on the dyno at the moment, but its still stock right:lol:



considering this is what you wrote instead of what you just said. Still you car would NOT beat a 996 turbo from a roll..........quarter maybe. but from 100+ not a snowballs chance in hell if the turbo guy knows how to drive at all.

Believe what you want, haha

cjg454ss
02-07-2006, 05:44 PM
considering this is what you wrote instead of what you just said. Still you car would NOT beat a 996 turbo from a roll..........quarter maybe. but from 100+ not a snowballs chance in hell if the turbo guy knows how to drive at all.

Believe what you want, haha


go mess with a boxter, your lt1 might beat that:thumbdn:

Scottslt1z28
02-07-2006, 09:52 PM
go mess with a boxter, your lt1 might beat that:thumbdn:


i would like you with your current state of mods say that when i roast your ass in the quarter :lol:

man, i wasnt making fun of your car.....i was just stating fact. Nice try at attempting to insult me. :Ohno:

cjg454ss
02-08-2006, 07:46 AM
i would like you with your current state of mods say that when i roast your ass in the quarter :lol:

man, i wasnt making fun of your car.....i was just stating fact. Nice try at attempting to insult me. :Ohno:

i dont think you have a chance roasting me. and i wont spray, but better hurry up, my cam is coming in soon:lol:

Scottslt1z28
02-08-2006, 04:34 PM
i dont think you have a chance roasting me. and i wont spray, but better hurry up, my cam is coming in soon:lol:



do you realize that every post you make the more mods you have????

i smell BS. :bs:

First you were stock, then you had full bolt ons and now you have spray too.

Wow, you have to be the fastest mechanic i have ever met :lol:



anyways back to the the topic at hand, even with full bolt-ons you couldn't even come close to beating a regular turbo, much less an x50

Does that insult you, that a car that costs 10x more than yours can beat you??

i mean, not to be an ass, but if you honestly think you could beat a turbo on top end you obviously dont know that much about cars.:newbie:



Just to educate you a little.....my friend in his 03 Carrera 4S (NOT even a turbo) beat a slightly modded 03 cobra from a 60-130 (which is where they shut-down) roll by a little over 2 cars.

Now for you to think that you (a STOCK SS......which is what you said in your first post) could beat a Turbo, much less a C4S from an interstate roll as you stated, then that is just complete ignorance on your part

Now even if you had full bolt-ons on a 2002 SS you wouldnt have a snowballs chance in hell against a turbo on top end. (like you said 100+)



Next thing you're gonna tell me is that you beat a Turbo and a Gt3 around Road Atlanta, Tuscuba, Road America, and you beat it by a minute on Nurburgring.:nono:

Scottslt1z28
02-08-2006, 05:00 PM
oh yeah, and post up a pic to your so called 360+rwhp dyno sheet through your auto.

BULLSHIT.........and what?? was the stock ls6 intake not good enouh for you so you had to put another one on there???

crazy3rdgen
02-08-2006, 07:21 PM
nice

john
02-08-2006, 07:44 PM
Lawdog, is that you??????

cjg454ss
02-09-2006, 08:27 AM
i ran a new porche twin turbo carrera s on I75 new bradenton, fl. we both hit it about 65mph and he pulled about a half car to about 100 and then by 145 i have him by 1 car and moving out. it was my first kill in the new ss.

oh yeah its an auto, 02 ss, all slp options, free mods.


my original post, where did i say stock, i listed my boltons. Your just a jackass, i havent done anything since then except install a nitrous kit. I have ordered a cam, whats the big deal. You can think and say what you like, but i willl post the dyno sheet today and a time slip from last night. the car went 8.1 with a 2.0 60' @ over 89 mph in the 1/8. without spray(last night). Honestly if you say im stock them im stock, the car did come with everything except the tune. All i know is that 89 mph in the 1/8 is not bad for an AUTO LS1, and that Porche wasnt going anywhere on me Turbo, or Not. Enough said

cjg454ss
02-09-2006, 08:30 AM
BULLSHIT.........and what?? was the stock ls6 intake not good enouh for you so you had to put another one on there???[/QUOTE]


Where did i ever say the LS6 intake was not good enough, i have it on my car.:thumbdn:

Scottslt1z28
02-09-2006, 10:37 AM
longtubes, y-pipe, cat back, lid, mass air, ported throttle body, dyno tune, mild weight reductions, ls6 intake, sfc, shift kit. Thats my mods and it put more than 360 to the wheels, I would not call that stock. Im tuning in a 150 rwhp on the dyno at the moment, but its still stock right:lol:
it says all slp options................and unless you are just fucking stupid

all slp options are:
bilstein stage 2 suspension
chrome wheels
center mounted exhaust
blackwing lid
auburn differential
and the other stuff that comes standard in an ss


now in a later post, you said you had a FULL bolt-on car (full intake, headers, ory, cat-back, and tuning)

and you also said that an ls6 intake was part of your "modifications"



So which is it...........stock w/ full slp options??? or a full-bolt on car???


and i said post a NA dyno sheet (where you claim to put down 360+rwhp with just those few bolt-ons listed above)..............anyone can put nitrous on a car and make big numbers. Hell i put down over 420rwhp with a stock lt1 and a 150shot a LONG time ago

Scottslt1z28
02-09-2006, 10:41 AM
BULLSHIT.........and what?? was the stock ls6 intake not good enouh for you so you had to put another one on there???


Where did i ever say the LS6 intake was not good enough, i have it on my car.:thumbdn:



you dont have very good reading comprehension skills do you??

cjg454ss
02-09-2006, 04:51 PM
ok i have the dyno sheet today made 346 rwhp today, conditions not as ideal as before. 100 shot made 449 rwhp. your a jack ass, :thumbdn:

quicky06
02-09-2006, 05:44 PM
post it
:gotpics:

cjg454ss
02-09-2006, 07:12 PM
post it
:gotpics:


exactly, someone delete it please

Capster78
02-09-2006, 08:16 PM
ummm... you do know that most of thouse turbo porches are in the 11's right. Even on the 150 shot it would be a struggle.

Scottslt1z28
02-09-2006, 08:43 PM
ummm... you do know that most of thouse turbo porches are in the 11's right. Even on the 150 shot it would be a struggle.



you beat me too it.

in a quarter mile race it would be believable for you to beat him (but only by a hair)

on top end...........he would still beat you. Even with your "full bolt-on, N20" car. which i am still convinced you dont have. Considering that was not your first description of your car.

Like i said the first time........are you offended that a stock $140,000 car can beat you???

cjg454ss
02-10-2006, 07:08 AM
you beat me too it.

in a quarter mile race it would be believable for you to beat him (but only by a hair)

on top end...........he would still beat you. Even with your "full bolt-on, N20" car. which i am still convinced you dont have. Considering that was not your first description of your car.

Like i said the first time........are you offended that a stock $140,000 car can beat you???


i had it dynoed yesterday asshole, you want the vin of the car too, what is your problem. I know camaros going 11.6s with 400-410 rwhp and stalls. Ive seen it with my own eyes. please someone close this thread,

cjg454ss
02-10-2006, 07:12 AM
post it
:gotpics:


can someone post my dyno sheet.

Scottslt1z28
02-10-2006, 03:01 PM
i had it dynoed yesterday asshole, you want the vin of the car too, what is your problem. I know camaros going 11.6s with 400-410 rwhp and stalls. Ive seen it with my own eyes. please someone close this thread,

YOU SIR ARE AN IDIOT

I am tired of debating this topic with you........im glad you think you have a 911 tt beater, rock on!!

blue02Z
02-10-2006, 06:16 PM
:Popcorn:

Liquifire
02-15-2006, 03:38 AM
so no one posted the dyno sheet yet?

Scottslt1z28
02-15-2006, 04:07 AM
http://www.tinypic.com/ there are tons of servers that are available...............but lets just drop this thread. its really old and pointless IMO

cjg454ss
02-15-2006, 08:09 AM
YOU SIR ARE AN IDIOT

I am tired of debating this topic with you........im glad you think you have a 911 tt beater, rock on!!

Stop replying, its not a debate, you say what you want, i know what i see, and yes i have seen cars with 400 rwhp run mid to high 11s, maybe not exactly 400 rwhp but 405-410 rwhp, nitrous cars, stall, ET Streets, gear. Im also sure others here have seen it. But hey i forgot you know everything up there in Clinton.

Capster78
02-15-2006, 05:55 PM
You sir, are a retard.. thats just it. Its all good and well untill someone calls you out and then you want to wine and talk about how much power your car makes. It doesent really matter. This is a magazine test too so you know if you get someone half way skilled behind the wheel its going to put out better numbers.


2004 Porche 911 Turbo Cabriolet
Vehicle type: rear-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 2+2-passenger, 2-door convertible
Price as tested: $136,695 (base price: $130,665)
Engine type: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve flat-6, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 220 cu in, 3600cc
Power (SAE net): 415 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 415 lb-ft @ 2700 rpm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transmission: 5-speed automatic with manumatic shifting
Wheelbase: 92.5 in
Length/width/height: 174.6/72.0/51.0 in
Curb weight: 3726 lb


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Zero to 60 mph: 3.8 sec
Zero to 100 mph: .9.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: .16.0 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph: 5.0 sec
Standing 1/4-mile: 12.2 sec @ 116 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 158 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.92 g
EPA fuel economy, city driving: 14 mpg
C/D-observed fuel economy: 15 mpg

Bottom line, you did not race a turbo poche

cjg454ss
02-16-2006, 07:59 AM
way to chime in when on a topic that has nothing to do with you and has been settled a week ago.:lol:

You sir, are a retard.. thats just it. Its all good and well untill someone calls you out and then you want to wine and talk about how much power your car makes. It doesent really matter. This is a magazine test too so you know if you get someone half way skilled behind the wheel its going to put out better numbers.


2004 Porche 911 Turbo Cabriolet
Vehicle type: rear-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 2+2-passenger, 2-door convertible
Price as tested: $136,695 (base price: $130,665)
Engine type: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve flat-6, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 220 cu in, 3600cc
Power (SAE net): 415 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 415 lb-ft @ 2700 rpm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transmission: 5-speed automatic with manumatic shifting
Wheelbase: 92.5 in
Length/width/height: 174.6/72.0/51.0 in
Curb weight: 3726 lb


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Zero to 60 mph: 3.8 sec
Zero to 100 mph: .9.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: .16.0 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph: 5.0 sec
Standing 1/4-mile: 12.2 sec @ 116 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 158 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.92 g
EPA fuel economy, city driving: 14 mpg
C/D-observed fuel economy: 15 mpg

Bottom line, you did not race a turbo poche

Scottslt1z28
02-16-2006, 10:10 AM
Stop replying, its not a debate, you say what you want, i know what i see, and yes i have seen cars with 400 rwhp run mid to high 11s, maybe not exactly 400 rwhp but 405-410 rwhp, nitrous cars, stall, ET Streets, gear. Im also sure others here have seen it. But hey i forgot you know everything up there in Clinton.



just fyi, i never said a 400rwhp car cant run an 11..............i would expect it too. i agree with you on the quarter mile part......400rwhp should at least get an 11.8 and deep into the 11's with the proper susp./drivetrain set-up

cjg454ss
02-16-2006, 11:45 AM
just fyi, i never said a 400rwhp car cant run an 11..............i would expect it too. i agree with you on the quarter mile part......400rwhp should at least get an 11.8 and deep into the 11's with the proper susp./drivetrain set-up


i thought you would agree on that, we just got off on the wrong start:yup:

Capster78
02-16-2006, 07:06 PM
way to chime in when on a topic that has nothing to do with you and has been settled a week ago.:lol:

Your not that observant, obviously mistaking a n/a porche for a turbo porche.. if you were you would have noticed iv posted several times in this thread already and am not just now "chiming in"..

Scottslt1z28
02-16-2006, 08:22 PM
Your not that observant, obviously mistaking a n/a porche for a turbo porche.. if you were you would have noticed iv posted several times in this thread already and am not just now "chiming in"..



porsche :)

cmadams4
02-17-2006, 10:14 AM
porsche :)


Thank you that was starting to drive me crazy. P-O-R-S-C-H-E.

...just trolling...

smitty's05gto
02-17-2006, 03:05 PM
good kill :)

Capster78
02-17-2006, 04:59 PM
Yea, my spelling sucks. Frekin spelling natzies!!! lol